If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.
Fark SearchWeb Fark

         more options... Create account

(Salon) Interesting Bill Clinton, Osama bin Laden and the pope are part of a new global power elite which runs the world. Group also includes Gettys, Rothschilds, the queen and The Colonel before he went tets up   (salon.com) divider line 123
More: Interesting  

123 Comments   (+0 »)


Fark.com's  Political Inclination Thermometric Analyzer:
Neutral 2.48% Fascist
Archived thread
First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all
 
Party Boy [TotalFark] 2008-03-14 12:08:26 PM  

In the course of human history ownership of sovereignty most often belonged to a small group of people, more often than not passed through some form of hereditary institutionalized hierarchy. People tend to forget that, with the age of the nation state, a peculiar phenomenon related to sovereignty vis-a-vis people happened; a revolutionary concept that sovereignty belonged to the people manifested out of a peculiar and unique time of increased power of the middle classes, demands for self determination, etc. etc. Ideas (albeit imperfect) of equality swept around in an era of faltering empires.

This concept of sovereignty belonging to you, is very new, very important to the ideological constructions of our nation (US) and is very, very fragile. When the TFA says

"Davos man" is an epithet coined by the conservative scholar Samuel Huntington to describe the very specific type that attends the conference. These are people who, as Huntington wrote, "have little need for national loyalty, view national boundaries as obstacles that thankfully are vanishing, and see national governments as residues from the past whose only useful function is to facilitate the elite's global operations."
...
Rothkopf's credible, if not especially original argument in "Superclass" is that over the past several decades a "global elite" has emerged whose connections to each other have become more significant than their ties to their home nations and governments. They schmooze regularly at conferences like Davos, go to the same schools, serve together on corporate and nonprofit boards, and above all do business with each other constantly -- to the point that they have become a kind of culture in themselves, a "class without a country," as Rothkopf puts it.
It is not a unique argument. Its more global than in the past, but the idea is largely old and well-worn. When he say's "Milton Friedman" he means neo-liberal economic policies, meaning [this]. Make no mistake, here in the US, the middle class is constricting[1], and it saddens me to see people denounce the nationstate without a similar and, more importantly, proportional reverence to their own ownership of sovereignty. The idea that sovereignty belongs to the people, rather than some small group of people who are more familiar with each other as compared to the people they live with is new, precious, and fragile. In the words of the author, these are people who know more people whilst walking through the "Davos party" than from "walking across the village green in the town we live in." The idea that sovereignty belongs to the people is very special, very unique, and it shouldn't be taken for granted. Ever.

 
MacEnvy [TotalFark] 2008-03-14 12:12:38 PM  
I read on the Internet it's actually CFR and the Bilderbergers. And also Steve Jobs.

 
what_now [TotalFark] 2008-03-14 12:15:55 PM  
I thought it was the Illuminati and Opus Dei?

 
burndtdan 2008-03-14 12:17:03 PM  
bp2.blogger.com

 
Party Boy [TotalFark] 2008-03-14 12:17:05 PM  

appropriate repost

Link

link Faux explains how globalization is creating a new global political elite-"The Party of Davos"-who have more in common with each other than with their fellow citizens. Their so-called trade agreements (like NAFTA) and the World Trade Organization act as a global constitution that protects only one kind of citizen-the corporate investor. The inevitable result will be a drop in American living standards that will have dramatic political consequences. Faux concludes with an original strategy for bringing democracy to the global economy beginning with a social contract for North America.

Moyers on "obscure section of NAFTA - Chapter 11 - except for multinational corporations who are using it to challenge democracy.
"

also
thread
post

 
Party Boy [TotalFark] 2008-03-14 12:24:44 PM  

 
BKITU [TotalFark] 2008-03-14 12:40:54 PM  
Do they meet tri-annually at a secret country mansion in Colorado known as "The Meadows?"

/I crave KFC fortnightly.

 
KaponoFor3 [recently expired TotalFark] 2008-03-14 12:55:29 PM  
Dudes don't forget the lizard people

 
AzDownboy [TotalFark] 2008-03-14 01:01:12 PM  
How could you hate the Colonel?

 
BKITU [TotalFark] 2008-03-14 01:08:24 PM  
AzDownboy: How could you hate the Colonel?

Oh, I hated the Colonel with his wee, beady eyes, and that smug look on his face! "Oh, you're gonna buy my chicken! Ohhhhh!"

 
RemyDuron 2008-03-14 01:31:35 PM  
God I hate conspiracy theorists. . .

I'm gonna go cry myself to sleep on me 'uge pillah.

 
halfof33 2008-03-14 01:35:04 PM  
That sound you just heard was Alex Jones touching himself to this article.

/card carrying member of the NWO.

 
Party Boy [TotalFark] 2008-03-14 01:35:39 PM  
Part of the Nation article
It's impossible to understand why Democratic Party leaders collaborated with Republicans to establish NAFTA unless reference is made to cross-border class interests. There was no compelling economic or political reason for Bill Clinton to make NAFTA a priority in his first year as President. In economic terms, nothing was broken that needed fixing. Politically, NAFTA and the WTO that followed traded away the interests of the Democratic Party's blue-collar electoral base while creating a bonanza for Republican constituencies on Wall Street and in red-state agribusiness.

But Clinton was more Davos than Democrat. Tutored by financier Robert Rubin, a prodigious fundraiser who became his Treasury Secretary, Clinton embraced a reactionary, pre-New Deal vision of a global future in which corporate investors were unregulated and the social contract was history. Indeed, in all three countries it was the leaders of the political parties that had historically claimed to represent ordinary people--the Democrats' Clinton, the Liberal Party's Jean Chrétien and the Institutional Revolutionary Party's Salinas--who delivered NAFTA to their global corporate clients, undercutting their own constituencies. "NAFTA happened," said the then-chairman of American Express, "because of the drive Bill Clinton gave it. He stood up against his two prime constituents, labor and environment, to drive it home over their dead bodies."

A year later, in November 1994, enough angry Democratic voters stayed away from the polls to give the Republicans control of the House. Since then, many working-class Americans, feeling abandoned by the Democrats, have responded to the Republican definition of class struggle as a fight over gun control, school prayer and abortion. The Democrats have still not recovered.


 
IXI Jim IXI [TotalFark] 2008-03-14 01:36:24 PM  
Bill Clinton, Osama bin Laden and the pope are part of a new global power elite which runs the world.

Sounds like the setup for the worst "Three guys walk into a bar" joke out there...

 
fernt 2008-03-14 01:36:37 PM  
RemyDuron: God I hate conspiracy theorists. . .

Oh. I see. You lurve people like Donald Rumsfeld and George W. Bush and Dick Cheney who tell you the truth huh? I mean, they wouldn't LIE to little ol' you would they? Certainly not Very Important People like that...being dishonest? With the very citizens they supposedly serve?

You believe those guys?

 
SnoreCriminal 2008-03-14 01:37:13 PM  
Eh, this isn't your run of the mill David Icke style kook. This is the kind of stuff you have to watch out for and...

nevermind most of you jackasses aren't even paying attention to me.

Fark it. See you guys in the work camps.

 
smooshie [TotalFark] 2008-03-14 01:38:41 PM  
fernt: Oh. I see. You lurve people like Donald Rumsfeld and George W. Bush and Dick Cheney who tell you the truth huh? I mean, they wouldn't LIE to little ol' you would they? Certainly not Very Important People like that...being dishonest? With the very citizens they supposedly serve?

No, I like facts. Facts like "The Bush administration is inept and corrupt, but that doesn't mean they're behind 9/11, Katrina, and my socks mysteriously vanishing despite me buying a new pair every farking month".

 
voltair's basterd luv child number 9 2008-03-14 01:38:53 PM  
duh!

 
smooshie [TotalFark] 2008-03-14 01:39:38 PM  
imgs.xkcd.com

/obligatory

 
halfof33 2008-03-14 01:39:44 PM  
Am I the only one who thinks "Party Boy" is the single most mis-named Farker in history?

I get the feeling he has never even been to a party.

 
robsul82 [TotalFark] 2008-03-14 01:39:53 PM  
Mom, I find it troubling you refer to the Weekly World News AS..."the paper." "The paper" contains facts.

 
Party Boy [TotalFark] 2008-03-14 01:45:22 PM  

...snip...
Consistent with a deal among the rich and powerful, NAFTA made the distribution of income, wealth and political power more unequal throughout the continent. In all three countries, wages in manufacturing fell behind productivity increases, shifting income from labor to capital. Ordinary Mexicans especially went through the economic wringer--to which the willingness of hundreds of thousands of them to risk their lives each year crossing the border continues to be tragic testimony.

On the other hand, opportunities blossomed for the rich and powerful in all three nations. American and Canadian investors got access to cheaper labor and privatized Mexican companies, while Mexican oligarchs got to broker the deals. One example was the way NAFTA was used to open up Mexico's banking system to foreign ownership, profiting elites on both sides of the border.
......
That well-connected people who move in and out of government and business act in ways that benefit their class and take advantage of their contacts to further their own interests is neither illegal nor new.
......
The looming economic crisis comes from the unsustainable US external debt. For more than a quarter-century, we Americans have been buying more from the rest of the world than we have been selling it, and borrowing from abroad to make up the difference. The resulting trade deficit has been a major engine of global growth under Davos's management. But common sense and simple arithmetic tell us that even the United States cannot go on much longer spending more than it is earning.

When the day of reckoning comes, high interest rates and a falling dollar will force us Americans to rebalance our trade by cutting the price of what we sell and raising the price of what we buy, lowering real incomes. The crisis in the nation's trade sector will be transmitted to the rest of the economy, made vulnerable by overindebted consumers, overleveraged pension funds and overpriced houses. Thanks to George W. Bush's reckless fiscal deficits, the government will have less ability to overcome an economic crisis through borrow-and-spend, as it did in the last economic downturn. With the appetite for America's IOUs diminishing, US politicians will have their hands full dealing with rising energy costs and the tottering finances of healthcare, education and pensions.

The basics of a harder-times scenario are not much in dispute. The debate is between those who foresee a hard landing and those who believe that the world's central bankers will somehow figure out a way to avoid a global financial meltdown. But hard landing or soft, even the staunchest supporters of globalization admit that lower living standards are already in the cards. N. Gregory Mankiw, who as Bush's chief economist famously praised the offshoring of American jobs, recently acknowledged that US reliance on foreign savings to support its consumption means a "less prosperous future."
...snip...

 
Walker [TotalFark] 2008-03-14 01:46:41 PM  
I thought everyone knew this?

/used to watch Alex Jones a lot.

 
dhudd 2008-03-14 01:46:48 PM  
IXI Jim IXI: Bill Clinton, Osama bin Laden and the pope are part of a new global power elite which runs the world.

Sounds like the setup for the worst "Three guys walk into a bar" joke out there...


I'll take a crack at this:

A rich man is dying of cancer. He invites Clinton, bin Laden and the Pope to have a drink and says to them "I'm going to break the rule that says you can't take it with you. I'm giving you each 2 million dollars and before they close my coffin put the money in." They agree, and a few weeks later after his funeral they meet again at the same bar. The Pope says "I have a confession to make. You know, I've always wanted to build a home for the orphans. I put $1 million in the coffin and kept $1 million for the orphans." bid Laden looks down, and says "I have to confess as well - I've always wanted to by my wives new veils. I bought 72 veils for $1 million and put the rest in the coffin." Clinton looks with disgust at both of them and says "I'm shocked and disgusted with the both of you; I put my personal check for $2 million in that coffin."

 
hockeyfarker [TotalFark] 2008-03-14 01:48:27 PM  
This is just a clever ploy by Major League Baseball to distract people from the REAL dark truth that they are clearly an evil cabal bent on world domination.

 
fizzix_is_fun 2008-03-14 01:49:29 PM  
I was voted most likely to take over the world in high school, so I'm really getting a kick out of my death ray.

 
Timanous [TotalFark] 2008-03-14 01:50:13 PM  
Walker: I thought everyone knew this?

/used to watch Alex Jones a lot.


Someone here just turned me onto his world of crazy and whenever I need a good laugh, off I go...

 
Corvus 2008-03-14 01:50:31 PM  
If only I had a +1 to give submitter.

 
Sym_pathetic 2008-03-14 01:51:20 PM  
smooshie: fernt: Oh. I see. You lurve people like Donald Rumsfeld and George W. Bush and Dick Cheney who tell you the truth huh? I mean, they wouldn't LIE to little ol' you would they? Certainly not Very Important People like that...being dishonest? With the very citizens they supposedly serve?

No, I like facts. Facts like "The Bush administration is inept and corrupt, but that doesn't mean they're behind 9/11, Katrina, and my socks mysteriously vanishing despite me buying a new pair every farking month".


Actually, If anyone here rea the article it doesn't blame anyone for any managed global catastrophes. Instead, it talks about a new international elite that has more power than the rest of the 6billion people in the world. There wasn't any conspiracy theories in it like Katrina levies or Tower 7. There was a well reasoned arguement that incredibly wealthy people can affect millions of peoples lives through their use of wealth, influence and connections. I never read once that Bush and Osama had a three way with hillary and birthed an Alien Anti-Christ.

 
burndtdan 2008-03-14 01:53:50 PM  
KaponoFor3: Dudes don't forget the lizard people

or the reverse vampires

 
IXI Jim IXI [TotalFark] 2008-03-14 01:54:04 PM  
dhudd: I'll take a crack at this:

well...MY faith has been restored. ;)

 
Sym_pathetic 2008-03-14 01:54:16 PM  
Party Boy:

STFU

no one ever reads copied and pasted posts this long. Just provide the link and anyone who cares will read it. You hurt your own argument by existing.

GBTW

 
Manfred J. Hattan 2008-03-14 01:54:49 PM  
dhudd: I'll take a crack at this:

My turn.

Bill Clinton, Osama bin Laden and the pope are aboard a ship which begins to sink. Also aboard the ship are a dozen newly pledged nuns. The pope says, "The lifeboard can only hold 12 people. These young women can do a lot of good over the coming years. We have to save the nuns." Osama says, "fark the nuns!" Clinton says, "Do you think there's time?"

 
Party Boy [TotalFark] 2008-03-14 01:56:54 PM  
Sym_pathetic: .../i>

Thats not long. Don't be rude.

 
RanDomino 2008-03-14 01:57:34 PM  
Party Boy- this is Fark, not your thesis presentation.

 
smooshie [TotalFark] 2008-03-14 01:58:57 PM  
Party Boy: Thats not long. Don't be rude.

Yes it is. It is long. It is too long. Go away. I do not want green eggs and ham.

/Green eggs and ham did 9/11

 
fernt 2008-03-14 01:59:33 PM  
smooshie: No, I like facts.

There are facts all over the place. Let me show you some of them:


FACT: 2001: Larry Silverstein makes $125 million down payment on WTC Complex valued at $3.2 billion, but Silverstein insures against terrorist attack for $7 billion.

FACT: EXEMPTION ALLOWED - Since 1978, the the WTC Twin Towers were allowed an exemption to New York City Building Codes.

FACT: EXEMPTION LIFTED - April 26, 2001, Larry Silverstein signs 99-year, $3.2 billion lease with the New York Port Authority, thereby "privatizing" the WTC Complex and statutorily lifting the prior WTC exemption. Deal closed on July 23, 2001.

FACT: City of New York orders study to deconstruct the Twin Towers, due to NYC code asbestos violations;
The orderly, planned demolition of a building is preceded by an engineering survey; surveys for asbestos and lead; the cutoff of electric, gas, water and sewer service; and many other precautions. A systematic survey and abatement program for asbestos is mandated by EPA under the Clean Air Act's National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants program. The New York City Asbestos Control Law also requires a pre-demolition asbestos survey. Otherwise, demolition can lead to the uncontrolled release of asbestos particles into the air.

FACT: The Assembly Office of Research in California studies WTC deconstruction costs; finds construction costs could total $20 billion;

FACT: September 11th, 2001, 9/11 attacks occur;

FACT: 24 January, 2002, Vice-President Dick Cheney telephones Tom Daschle insisting no 9/11 inquiry be made;

FACT: 28 January, 2002, President Bush meets Sen. Tom Daschle for breakfast in White House; Bush requests Daschle, no 9/11 inquiry be made.

FACT: In the weekends prior to 9/11, the Twin Towers were shut down, evacuated and the power cut completely off. Employees complained such has never happened in their twenty years of working in the Twin Towers. Employees witnessed numerous foreign-looking workers carrying heavy bags of equipment into the Twin Towers;

FACT: Silverstein admits to blowing up WTC Bldg. 7 on PBS documentary, "America Rebuilds." Silverstein claims he discussed the demolition with the N.Y. Fire Dept., and the NYFD made the decision to "pull" WTC Building 7 - OPINION: Baloney. Fire departments don't blow up 47-story steel and concrete buildings.

FACT: Silverstein sues insurance companies; collects double-payments for "two separate terrorist attacks." Instead of losing $20 billion on the NYC-ordered deconstruction of the Twin Towers, Silverstein collects over $545 million on WTC Bldg. 7 alone - and it wasn't even struck by a plane. Silverstein's Gross Profit: Over $5 billion dollars!

FACT: All surviving N.Y. firefighters, supervisors, bosses and chiefs were required to give their deposition as to what they did and saw on Sept. 11th, 2001. Those depositions are located and archived here: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/12/nyregion/12cnd-histories.html?ex=1281499200&en =58364cb529e7367e&ei=5089&partner=rssyahoo&emc=rss


I reviewed each of those depositions and created a webpage of their testimony which indicates they witnessed a demolition being conducted. This webpage is located here: http://www.investigate911.com/911firefighters.htm

FACT: According to numerous scientists, the laws of physics were not suspended on September 11th, 2001:

FACT: On September 11th, 2001, and the weekends preceding September 11th, President Bush's little brother, Marvin Bush, was on the board of the security company, Securacom, for the Twin Towers.

 
dhudd 2008-03-14 02:01:28 PM  
Manfred J. Hattan: dhudd: I'll take a crack at this:

My turn.

Bill Clinton, Osama bin Laden and the pope are aboard a ship which begins to sink. Also aboard the ship are a dozen newly pledged nuns. The pope says, "The lifeboard can only hold 12 people. These young women can do a lot of good over the coming years. We have to save the nuns." Osama says, "fark the nuns!" Clinton says, "Do you think there's time?"


Excelente!

 
Party Boy [TotalFark] 2008-03-14 02:02:40 PM  
RanDomino: ...

You'd think I posted Tolstoy. An MA thesis is roughly 100 pages or so. Thats a light post.

Sheesh.

 
Party Boy [TotalFark] 2008-03-14 02:04:04 PM  
There. Get butthurt over that, Fark Commandos

 
noheadphones 2008-03-14 02:05:58 PM  
Party Boy--It's interesting stuff and pertains to the thread...keep posting.

 
Galen_Rasputin 2008-03-14 02:08:07 PM  
Oh subby! Subby! Subby! Don't you know that the Orbital Mind Control Laser (OMCL) was blown by the US Airforce at the order of President Bush in an effort to give McCain a chance at winning the White House. Unfortunately that also is what allowed Obama to challenge Hillary. See Bill Clinton is in control of the super secret Leftist Illuminati and without the OMCL Hillary is losing the bid for president.

 
RanDomino 2008-03-14 02:08:59 PM  
fernt

why does there have to be a conspiracy? "US policy caused blowback" is outrageous enough, and doesn't change what we should do. When you say "9/11 conspiracy zomg" everyone ignores you and thinks you and everyone associated with you is crazy.

As far as I can tell, the only reason for saying "9/11 conspiracy zomg" anymore is to absolve our foreign policy of any blame... so it makes sense that the truthers hooked up with Ron Paul's campaign; they're all insane ultra-nationalists.

 
Sym_pathetic 2008-03-14 02:09:31 PM  
No, it's an article from the Nation. Just post the link.

 
smooshie [TotalFark] 2008-03-14 02:09:43 PM  
fernt: There are facts all over the place. Let me show you some of them:


FACT: 2001: Larry Silverstein makes $125 million down payment on WTC Complex valued at $3.2 billion, but Silverstein insures against terrorist attack for $7 billion.

FACT: EXEMPTION ALLOWED - Since 1978, the the WTC Twin Towers were allowed an exemption to New York City Building Codes.

FACT: EXEMPTION LIFTED - April 26, 2001, Larry Silverstein signs 99-year, $3.2 billion lease with the New York Port Authority, thereby "privatizing" the WTC Complex and statutorily lifting the prior WTC exemption. Deal closed on July 23, 2001.

FACT: City of New York orders study to deconstruct the Twin Towers, due to NYC code asbestos violations;
The orderly, planned demolition of a building is preceded by an engineering survey; surveys for asbestos and lead; the cutoff of electric, gas, water and sewer service; and many other precautions. A systematic survey and abatement program for asbestos is mandated by EPA under the Clean Air Act's National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants program. The New York City Asbestos Control Law also requires a pre-demolition asbestos survey. Otherwise, demolition can lead to the uncontrolled release of asbestos particles into the air.

FACT: The Assembly Office of Research in California studies WTC deconstruction costs; finds construction costs could total $20 billion;

FACT: September 11th, 2001, 9/11 attacks occur;

FACT: 24 January, 2002, Vice-President Dick Cheney telephones Tom Daschle insisting no 9/11 inquiry be made;

FACT: 28 January, 2002, President Bush meets Sen. Tom Daschle for breakfast in White House; Bush requests Daschle, no 9/11 inquiry be made.

FACT: In the weekends prior to 9/11, the Twin Towers were shut down, evacuated and the power cut completely off. Employees complained such has never happened in their twenty years of working in the Twin Towers. Employees witnessed numerous foreign-looking workers carrying heavy bags of equipment into the Twin Towers;

FACT: Silverstein admits to blowing up WTC Bldg. 7 on PBS documentary, "America Rebuilds." Silverstein claims he discussed the demolition with the N.Y. Fire Dept., and the NYFD made the decision to "pull" WTC Building 7 - OPINION: Baloney. Fire departments don't blow up 47-story steel and concrete buildings.

FACT: Silverstein sues insurance companies; collects double-payments for "two separate terrorist attacks." Instead of losing $20 billion on the NYC-ordered deconstruction of the Twin Towers, Silverstein collects over $545 million on WTC Bldg. 7 alone - and it wasn't even struck by a plane. Silverstein's Gross Profit: Over $5 billion dollars!

FACT: All surviving N.Y. firefighters, supervisors, bosses and chiefs were required to give their deposition as to what they did and saw on Sept. 11th, 2001. Those depositions are located and archived here: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/12/nyregion/12cnd-histories.html?ex=1281499200&en =58364cb529e7367e&ei=5089&partner=rssyahoo&emc=rss


I reviewed each of those depositions and created a webpage of their testimony which indicates they witnessed a demolition being conducted. This webpage is located here: http://www.investigate911.com/911firefighters.htm

FACT: According to numerous scientists, the laws of physics were not suspended on September 11th, 2001:

FACT: On September 11th, 2001, and the weekends preceding September 11th, President Bush's little brother, Marvin Bush, was on the board of the security company, Securacom, for the Twin Towers.


FACT : A few inconsistencies doesn't make a conspiracy. See the moon landing loons.

FACT (THIS ONE IS DEFINITELY TRUE, AS IT IS IN CAPITAL LETTERS!!!) : Out of the thousands of people who would be involved, no videos of anyone admitting their role? No-one coming forth with evidence saying "I was involved"?

FACT : The Bush admin couldn't conspire to plant a few WMD's in Iraq. They completely botched Katrina (unless you believe in Karl's weather machine as well). And yet Chimpy was behind the most successful conspiracy and cover-up in history?

FACT : Your points make as much sense as those of creationists.

FACT : Here's an excellent site that goes through each and every Truther point and destroys them to pieces : Link

 
muck4doo [TotalFark] 2008-03-14 02:10:39 PM  
They've been doing this since the dawn of civilization.

img219.imageshack.us

 
Sym_pathetic 2008-03-14 02:11:03 PM  
RanDomino: fernt

why does there have to be a conspiracy? "US policy caused blowback" is outrageous enough, and doesn't change what we should do. When you say "9/11 conspiracy zomg" everyone ignores you and thinks you and everyone associated with you is crazy.

As far as I can tell, the only reason for saying "9/11 conspiracy zomg" anymore is to absolve our foreign policy of any blame... so it makes sense that the truthers hooked up with Ron Paul's campaign; they're all insane ultra-nationalists.


I want to make love to your logic while you watch.

 
Party Boy [TotalFark] 2008-03-14 02:11:44 PM  
noheadphones: Party Boy--It's interesting stuff and pertains to the thread...keep posting.

Thanks.

I'm going to finish something and come back. I wish us middle class Americans would see our common interests in this global market.

 
fernt 2008-03-14 02:13:28 PM  
RanDomino: "US policy caused blowback" is outrageous enough,

What's outrageous about that? It's pretty obvious.

Although I see today where everyone is jumping on Obama's "spiritual advisor" guy for essentially saying that. It just happens to be the truth and isn't very surprising when you take into account what we've been doing in the Middle East for decades.

What's hard to believe is the official story of it (9/11 Commission Report). It's easily taken apart and Griffin has done a good job of it.

It probably not worth arguing about because it's gotten to the point of almost religious faith and belief. Those who simply cannot believe that elements within our military-industrial-defense complex would either help or just allow the attack to happen will choose to look the other way and label "truthers" as crazies. Those who have a little less faith in the lies our government pumps out on a daily basis look a little harder for the answers - which are still forthcoming.

I choose not to trust the Bush Administration.

 
Big_Bad_Dad 2008-03-14 02:13:28 PM  
fernt = palm slap

 
Displayed 50 of 123 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | » | Last | Show all


[Continue Farking]