After nearly eight years of King Stork, it's understandable why King Log might be a welcome idea.

abb3w: After nearly eight years of King Stork, it's understandable why King Log might be a welcome idea.

Barack Obama: it's better than bad, it's good!

No one knew what he had done; no one knew what he would do; no one cared whether they knew; all only wanted to be a part of it.

They can keep SAYING no one knows what he's done, but it's been posted here many times. Anyone who doesn't know by now is simply willfully ignorant. And, that pretty much describes a Republican to a "T".

They can keep SAYING no one knows what he's done, but it's been posted here many times. Anyone who doesn't know by now is simply willfully ignorant. And, that pretty much describes a Republican to a "T".

Not to mention a Hillary supporter. Hillary's campaign has been by the book Republican.

Whamdangler:
They can keep SAYING no one knows what he's done, but it's been posted here many times. Anyone who doesn't know by now is simply willfully ignorant. And, that pretty much describes a Republican to a "T".


Well, it certainly describes VDH, who's desperate for more wars to write about so that he can continue to pretend he's some type of warrior-scholar-poet-Renaissance Man.

(Mind, I generally liked Carnage & Culture, but it got a bit masturbatory from time-to-time).

I don't care what this wiener says, I still want one of those invisible dogs on a leash things.

And now, as some people wake up from their pet rock purchase, they are seeing they've de facto nominated someone rated about the Senate's most liberal senator based on three years of experience there.

People are turning against Obama? Coulda fooled me, what with that decisive victory in Wyoming yesterday.

I'm still surprised people fall for the 'most liberal' line. Every Democratic nominee is the 'most liberal' of the Democrats running.

DO YOU SMEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEELLLLL what Barock is cooking?

OH YEAH!

My Obama Pet Rock. Let me show you it.

If one removed every reference to Obama and replaced it with Rush Limbaugh, the article would accurately explain conservative groupthink.

Well. That was dumb.

FTA:
The Democrats have boxed them into a situation of running a candidate that has out-sourced all negative attacks to the New York Times, political junkies and columnists, in order to remain above the fray and loyal to the "new" politics of change and hope.

Last time I checked, the Times was solidly behind Clinton... and was running the negative attacks on her behalf, so she wouldn't have to early in the race........

Psychotropic: My Obama Pet Rock. Let me show you it.

That looks like a farking Obama amoeba without staining.

Is that person doing matching donations to Obama still around? I'll throw a few bucks to Obama, but if I can boost my donation, that woudl be sweet...

If Obama is a pet rock, McCain is a living fossil.

This should be on display in the museum of Conservative douchenozzles with a keyboard and nothing new to write.

I can believe I thought of this last week..how weird.

Necrosis: Is that person doing matching donations to Obama still around? I'll throw a few bucks to Obama, but if I can boost my donation, that woudl be sweet...

Please do (new window)

From TFA "Democrats will have to run against a Republican moderate in states like California, Florida, Michigan, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, and Texas that their candidate lost in the primary, after a nasty fight in which Sen. Clinton finished as the surger."

OK, now this pea-brained fancy hat wearing shoestring wannabe is gonna tell me, after I had no chance to vote, that HIllary won my state? Now I am here often and there are some kooky articles, but this guy is Ann Coulter without the wig.

So here is the plan. I am running for his position as Victor David Hanson. I would like to have everyone vote for me for this position. I will be the next Victor David Hanson for the national review. I am running unapposed so assuming that I get more votes than undecided I will take his position as Victor David Hanson. And he cannot run against me, because you see the place he works they do not acknowledge that his position is up for grabs. But according to his logic, that is an unimportant fact. So when I show up at his office, or his house, and announce that I was elected the new him, he will surely acknowledge my vast intelligence in following his own train of thought. I look forward to writing the next crazy GOP thing that slimes its way into my tiny brain.

/Vote brimstoner for VDH
//I am not a crook!!

HEY, HEY, HEY, HEY

Mmmm... greenlit stupidity.

Nothing else to say here.

and yes my slashies do lean to the right.

In other news, no one cares what people from NRO think and that makes them desperate to grab attention. More details on this and other things that have failed to slow the momentum of Barack Obama at 11..

/gObama!

I'm old enough to remember pet rocks. Which means I'm old enough to fully appreciate the jaw-dropping stupidity of that opinion piece. It should be axiomatic: when your best line of attack is to compare a presidential candidate to a 36-year-old flash-in-the-pan toy craze on the basis that "everybody wants it", then it's time to man up and admit: you got nothing. NOOOOOOTHING. Go home.

GaryPDX: I can [sic] believe I thought of this last week..how weird.

I can, and no it isn't. I've read your posts.

Thank you NRO! I forgot how stupid I was... I now see the light! How is it possible for pure stupidity like this to get the green?

LoLoRz B Hussein is liek Tamagotchi!

How many times are people going to post his record and accomplishments before Conservatives acknowledge that they can't shape reality through denial?

The rabbit hole. Come down it.
The deeper you go, the more this shiat makes sense.

/This message approved by John McCain's gimpy right arm

Shaggy_C: LoLoRz B Hussein is liek Tamagotchi!

No he isn't. When you split him open you don't get any liquid crystal. :\

The Onion got it right.
http://www.theonion.com/content/video/poll_bullshiat_is_most_important

Enjoy.

I went through this article as carefully as I could and found NO true facts. Perfect piece for Republicans.

Nobody puts 'Bama in a corner...

I don't doubt that many supporters of Obama are on the "change" or "yes we can" bandwagons, but I don't think this is unique to him, nor is it a new phenomenon. I imagine if you polled the red states on why they voted for Bush, personal characteristics would come out way above policy.

Your Faith is Creepy: I'm old enough to remember pet rocks. Which means I'm old enough to fully appreciate the jaw-dropping stupidity of that opinion piece. It should be axiomatic: when your best line of attack is to compare a presidential candidate to a 36-year-old flash-in-the-pan toy craze on the basis that "everybody wants it", then it's time to man up and admit: you got nothing. NOOOOOOTHING. Go home.

It's the National Review. They don't actually care if they are right, as long as they thwart the left's reforms. They have even basically stated that openly. They believe that their role is to slow down the pace of change in America and preserve the status quo. I don't know why anyone would want to read something that openly admits they are willing to lie in service of their agenda.

Smellvin: Shaggy_C: LoLoRz B Hussein is liek Tamagotchi!

No he isn't. When you split him open you don't get any liquid crystal. :\

You don't know unless you've tried...

Captain Darling: I don't doubt that many supporters of Obama are on the "change" or "yes we can" bandwagons, but I don't think this is unique to him, nor is it a new phenomenon. I imagine if you polled the red states on why they voted for Bush, personal characteristics would come out way above policy.

The reason that "change" is a powerful motivator right now is precisely because of George W. Bush. Period.

Well, it's refreshing to read a totally non-biased article like that for once.

// gag.

I see NRO continues to live up to the high journalistic standards set by the National Enquirer

It's cute how the people who thought George W. Bush was the best choice for President are trying to warn the rest of us about making a poor choice. If NRO or GaryPDX thinks I'm making a mistake, that's actually a good sign that I'm on the right track.

Besides, even our second best candidate is a better choice than your nominee.

for that i learnt to reed?

/learned
//read

Those NRO guys just don't understand what it means for a politician to be a great communicator.

/that is all

Mnemia: The reason that "change" is a powerful motivator right now is precisely because of George W. Bush. Period.

three periods? really?

Poopspasm: How many times are people going to post his record and accomplishments before Conservatives acknowledge that they can't shape reality through denial?

Go pull up some poll numbers of people who believe Iraq was linked to 9/11 and that we found WMDs in Iraq.

They seem to be pretty damned effective at doing so. The fact that we see this "Obama has done nothing!" meme every thread should tell you that.

/Evolution is just a theory
\\The Surge is working

Shaggy_C: Please do (new window)

I went through that link and when I entered $3.01 to get it matched and it said it has to be at least $5... So that is what I did, but I guess that means it won't get matched? :(

/gave $5 to Kerry last time
//shoulda saved it for this one

::sigh:: Yet another masturbatory piece for moronic far right wing extremists.

Necrosis: I went through that link and when I entered $3.01 to get it matched and it said it has to be at least $5... So that is what I did, but I guess that means it won't get matched? :(

I don't think they take credit card donations under $5. I just donate $6.02 :P

so Obama is now Saddam Hussein, Osama Bin Laden, Hitler, a pimp, a drug dealer, a sexist, a homosexual, a communist, satan incarnate, a phony, a liberal, an empty suit, some inexperienced punk, a crack head, a g-d damn negro, anti-semetic, a muslim, a terrorist, a harbringer of doom, unpatriotic, and now a pet-rock

man, Obama is getting such an easy ride, i can't believe it!

i mean, really, if any of those statements were true/self-evident or right, then how come Hillary or McCain can't beat him? it seems to me that labeling the one in front as a horrible person, but then being completely unable to compete with said person when it counts... just makes your case even worse, since this is an election of ideas

Necrosis: Shaggy_C: Please do (new window)

I went through that link and when I entered $3.01 to get it matched and it said it has to be at least $5... So that is what I did, but I guess that means it won't get matched? :(

/gave $5 to Kerry last time
//shoulda saved it for this one

it will get matched. the $3.01 is from a speech a while back.

gimmedaloot: Mnemia: The reason that "change" is a powerful motivator right now is precisely because of George W. Bush. Period.

three periods? really?

Maybe it needed an ellipses...?