Unlike Reagan, people hate the biatch.

Two can play at that game. If she weasels the nomination, we could see a 3rd candidate make a bid.

and then proceed to run the country into the ground for 8 years after.

I read that as "Clinton chimp."

Well I, for one, am quite surprised by this notion.

Truly.

perdu

Resulting in a McCain win.

It's not Fark, it's eleanorclift.com

The author of the article is another one of those idiots who think that the remaining undecided superdelegates overwhelmingly prefer Clinton. If they were, they would have endorsed her back when she was Mrs. Inevitable, not now that even her margin among superdelegates only is down to about 40.

whidbey: I read that as "Clinton chimp."

I read the headline on the article as "Eleanor Clit"
oh and how the fark did this get greened when its the same article right underneath?

/REPEAT!!!!!!

Tow unrelated comments:



This country was founded on many values including freedom of religion.
If you had read Obamas book "The Aduacity of Hope" you would know He has been a practicing christian for 15 years, and yes has studied the Muslim religion.
I believe the real enemy are people who judge others without really knowing the facts.



Does anyone recall the Whitewater Scandal where Bill & Hill scammed people out of real estate money? (Mostly seniors) Do people forget that Hillary stole $200, 000 worth of furniture and art from the White House? Is Bill the Thrill going to keep his pecker in his pocket? These are only a few of my questions.
Obama 08 Yes We Can!

If Hillary wins, I'm voting McCain so Obama has a chance in another 4 years.

hillary RODAN clinton

borg: Unlike Reagan, people hate the biatch.


This.

/I miss The Gipper.

The Repubs are hoping Hillary wins because as of right now it's the only way McCain can actually win. If she does somehow manage to ruin the Democratic Party I hope Obama does launch a third party bid. He could effectivly split maybe a quarter of the Repubs and maybe half the Dems. It could end well.

The_Sponge:

I miss The Gipper.

Well, color ME surprised!

she's a fuhking idiot

those self absorbed Clintons would willfully fuhk their party
out of sheer vanity

as for winningin four years,
nobody likes an old hag

and honey, you're already there

With any luck Obama will deliver her another string of defeats in the coming contests. Then all of this will be a moot point.

As for the Al Gore for president stuff, I'm against it. For one, if it would split the party to give the nomination to someone with the least pledged delegates, what would it do to give it to someone with NO pledged delegates?

I saw another article about it somewhere and it had a link to email Al gore begging him to run. I emailed him asking him not to even consider it for a second.

The decision will then fall to the superdelegates, elected officials and party people often demonized in the media as hacks or backroom operators. A majority of them will swing behind one or the other candidate-likely Hillary Clinton-

And right there is where I stopped reading because I'm better read on how the supers are leaning than she is.

Is it just me or does this article look alot like the one below it?

This article would be the same as the one below it.

Maybe it was so important they wanted us to read it twice? Or maybe they started their beer drinking early?

Quel: If Hillary wins, I'm voting McCain so Obama has a chance in another 4 years.

Me too. And I'd be willing to bet there are a lot of other voters out there with the same thoughts.

The_Sponge: /I miss The Gipper.

You mean that war criminal who couldn't even stay awake in meet--

Oh nevermind.

I feel nauseas. The fact that they openly admit they are ok with losing this election, letting the GOP win, and then winning in 4 years? Do they care about this country at all?

DamnYankees: I feel nauseas. The fact that they openly admit they are ok with losing this election, letting the GOP win, and then winning in 4 years? Do they care about this country at all?

Obviously they care. The problem is they sincerely believe Hillary is the only one who can possibly fix America, except for Senator McCain. They have to save America from this Hope scourge.

/sarcasm

This woman never gets tired of being wrong. Go suck John McLaughlin's dick.

Has anyone passed around the idea of Obama becoming an independant if the Dems betray him? Comments please....

Congrats to the Mods on green-lighting the EXACT SAME ARTICLE TWICE IN A ROW.

BAD KITTY! All farked up!

justanothersumguy: Has anyone passed around the idea of Obama becoming an independant if the Dems betray him? Comments please....

He would bring majority of African-American, Youth & voters generally disgusted with both parties with him & in 15 years The Dems would be a foot note in history like the Whig Party. Of course Rebublican would run the country for the next 50 years.

The Democrats could have won if they had only stuck behind a single candidate, presenting a united front against the Republican nominee. But they didn't; instead, the leading Democratic candidate formed his own splinter platform, and the resulting mess led to a Republican president elected with less than 50% of the popular vote.

A future forecast in 2008? Not quite. That was exactly what happened in 1860.

justanothersumguy: Has anyone passed around the idea of Obama becoming an independant if the Dems betray him? Comments please....

Not happening. He doesn't have that much cred. Besides, at his age he can sweat it and have 6 or 7 more go's at it. 08/12 are Hillary's last stand. She'd surrender to France if it meant she got to sit in the seat, it's really all she cares about. Hell, even Cheney, somewhere in that little black place he calls a soul, cares more about [what he thinks is America] than her.

El Uno Magnifico: The Democrats could have won if they had only stuck behind a single candidate, presenting a united front against the Republican nominee. But they didn't; instead, the leading Democratic candidate formed his own splinter platform, and the resulting mess led to a Republican president elected with less than 50% of the popular vote.

A future forecast in 2008? Not quite. That was exactly what happened in 1860.

Umm...not exactly the same type of situation. There's no major issue dividing the Dem party today like slavery did back then.

1) "It was only because of a fluke at the Supreme Court " -
the LIE that will not die.

2) Gosling: The decision will then fall to the superdelegates, elected officials and party people often demonized in the media as hacks or backroom operators. A majority of them will swing behind one or the other candidate-likely Hillary Clinton-

And right there is where I stopped reading because I'm better read on how the supers are leaning than she is.

This.

A majority of [superdelegates] will swing behind one or the other candidate-likely Hillary Clinton-boosting her over the top even if she lags behind Barack Obama in the pledged delegate count.

Cite?

(emphasis mine)

Umm...not exactly the same type of situation. There's no major issue dividing the Dem party today like slavery did back then.DamnYankees: El Uno Magnifico: The Democrats could have won if they had only stuck behind a single candidate, presenting a united front against the Republican nominee. But they didn't; instead, the leading Democratic candidate formed his own splinter platform, and the resulting mess led to a Republican president elected with less than 50% of the popular vote.

A future forecast in 2008? Not quite. That was exactly what happened in 1860.

Umm...not exactly the same type of situation. There's no major issue dividing the Dem party today like slavery did back then.

The point was to show how a divided party always loses. No matter if Obama wins and Clinton doesn't give him support, or vice-versa, or if Obama decides to go third party, the end result will always be a McCain victory in the fall. Taft, Roosevelt, and Wilson is another example.

she will not want

my god

Take me, to another side!

Some people sit and wonder, but why?

She can destroy happiness?

of course? beyond me, ;et's do it?

Right now?my bad

DamnYankees: I feel nauseas. The fact that they openly admit they are ok with losing this election, letting the GOP win, and then winning in 4 years? Do they care about this country at all?

What they care about is the success of their New Democrat movement. The Clintons' actually don't care about, and don't really like, the Democratic Party. Their allegiance is the the Democratic Leadership Council, which has been working for years to co-opt the party for their own agenda.

It is eerily reminiscent of the way the neoconservative movement and PNAC co-opted the Republican party and its successful conservative movement a few years earlier, right down to their campaign tactics.

/all links pop.

HA HA

CHAZZZ mixed up Fark with his CHAT WINDOW!!!

I can haz Monster?

Neither party represents the people. I was hoping losing to Bush in 04 would tear apart the Democrat Party so that they would have to rebuild on what they originally represented (I know I can be naive).

Only several months ago, I was hoping the same would happen to the Republicans as they didn't seem to have a chance in hell in winning, but once again I see it will have to be the Dems that implode. I think a moderate middle party would take a substantial amount of people from both sides.

I still think the average moderate Republican and Democrat have more in common than their fringe extreme counterparts.

Reagan didn't screw up Ford in 1976- Ford did when he pardoned Nixon. That plus the overall stench from Watergate.

there is no more irrelevant talking head than Eleanor Clift

/with the possible exception of Pat Buchanan

perdu: Two can play at that game. If she weasels the nomination, we could see a 3rd candidate make a bid.

Obama should just drop out and let Clinton rot in the grave she dug for herself and the party. Obama makes a 3rd party bid with a moderate republican as his VP. Bi-partisan ticket without the Clinon baggage or psychosis, nor the McCain dementia. Winner.

Killer Miller: It's not Fark, it's eleanorclift.com



Eleanor, gee I think your swellinor!

/WRONG!
/NEXT ISSUE!