O'rly?

Quick, to the Romeromobile! Hillary Clinton just might be an abrasive liar!

Mmmmmm... I love the stale smell of hypocrisy in the evening.

So, here's the thing...
Were those tax returns ever released and was anything dirty found in them?

For all you young Obamaniacs out there who might be shocked at this...

This is politics as usual in America for over two hundred years.

Sorry to disappoint you.

EvilTwinSkipster: Sorry to disappoint you.

Doesn't make it acceptable or any less deplorable.

Rick Lazio. There's a name I haven't heard in a while.

EvilTwinSkipster: For all you young Obamaniacs out there who might be shocked at this...

This is politics as usual in America for over two hundred years.

I know you troll and don't pay attention, but I wanted to remind everyone how ignorant this post was regarding the Obamaniacs and their knowledge of history, as well as their opinions on the historic political game.

To summarize: Swing and a miss.

Ceph: EvilTwinSkipster: Sorry to disappoint you.

Doesn't make it acceptable or any less deplorable.

Doesn't mean her blatant hypocrisy can't be blasted into America's living rooms tonight.

Obama bishop to king's knight 3!

EvilTwinSkipster: For all you young Obamaniacs out there who might be shocked at this...

This is politics as usual in America for over two hundred years.

Sorry to disappoint you.

WE HAVE ALWAYS USED CHAMBER POTS AND BY GOD THIS NEW TOILET INVENTION ISNT GOING TO DESTROY OUR HERITAGE

I was searching GIS for a good image of Fry so I could do a "burn!' thing. Sadly, I never made beyond page three because of this thing:



Anyway..ya..burn.

Politicians often take positions based solely on what is best for them at that particular time.

O thank god, another hillary-bashing thread. It had been way too long, at least since...o, wait, there was one right underneath this one.

/both candidates suck t-rex balls

Ceph: EvilTwinSkipster: Sorry to disappoint you.

Doesn't make it acceptable or any less deplorable.

Well to be fair, as an avowed socialist Hillary certainly considers all private weatlh to be government property. So fileing a tax return is a bit redundant when the government already owns 100% of your income.

Bored Horde: EvilTwinSkipster: For all you young Obamaniacs out there who might be shocked at this...

This is politics as usual in America for over two hundred years.

Sorry to disappoint you.

WE HAVE ALWAYS USED CHAMBER POTS AND BY GOD THIS NEW TOILET INVENTION ISNT GOING TO DESTROY OUR HERITAGE

But, but, Clinton... Oh wait.

Ceph: Doesn't make it acceptable or any less deplorable.

Not less deplorable for sure.

Less aceeptable, not so much. Mudslinging and dirty tactics have been part and parcel of the American political landscape since the early 19th century, even before. It has been acceptable all that time and will probably remain so as so often the winners of these contests use these tactics.

EvilTwinSkipster: For all you young Obamaniacs out there who might be shocked at this...

This is politics as usual in America for over two hundred years.

Sorry to disappoint you.

I'm hardly "young" and while I hope to get the chance to vote for Obama for president I wouldn't use "maniac" to describe my enthusiasm for him as a candidate.

Ask yourself, however --- six months after the election when all the improprieties and bogus electoral rolls and financial shenanigains are revealed, who do you think will have more check marks in the "scandal" column? Barack or Hillary?

How many times in her life has Hillary had the suffix "-gate" attached to her personal or business or political dealings?

This is what I'm talking about!! This is what my man B-Rock needs to do at this stage in the game.

Set the tone. Be the initiator, not the responder. And there's a way to do so WITHOUT slinging mud or getting into dirty politics.

One of the ways is like this. Simply ask a question. "Why won't Hillay release her tax returns as she said she would in the interest of full disclosure?" Then simply sit back and watch as she lies and double talks her way into trouble.

With all of Clinton's spin and her 35 years of baggage, she can't help but contradict herself. So, again, Obama doesn't have to get dirty. He merely has to ask question and/or be the first one to bring up certain topics. Clinton will do the rest of the damage to herself on her own.

/Yes I'm saying she's a masochist
//More proof is her staying married to Bill all these years
///Probably going to get called a misogynist for calling Hillary a masochist

Bill_Wick's_Friend: EvilTwinSkipster: For all you young Obamaniacs out there who might be shocked at this...

This is politics as usual in America for over two hundred years.

Sorry to disappoint you.

I'm hardly "young" and while I hope to get the chance to vote for Obama for president I wouldn't use "maniac" to describe my enthusiasm for him as a candidate.

Ask yourself, however --- six months after the election when all the improprieties and bogus electoral rolls and financial shenanigains are revealed, who do you think will have more check marks in the "scandal" column? Barack or Hillary?

How many times in her life has Hillary had the suffix "-gate" attached to her personal or business or political dealings?

I hate it when people slap a -gate on something. Watergate wasn't even that big of a scandal, it was just the last nail in the coffin of an incredibly unpopular president.

It was also the last time the Media really did its job in outing government corruption in an effective manner, insofar as I know.

Hey, Subster, doesn't naming Lazio in the headline sort of give it away? That was a pretty high profile race, after all. Lazio was parodied on SNL, etc. (For some reason he was drinking milk. I'm not sure what that was a reference too. Maybe they were just implying that he looked like a little kid next to Hillary.)

Ya know, even though I plan on voting Barry if he wins, a part of me wants Hillary to get the nomination just to witness the immediate about face that would come from many..many...many..farkers.

/ Teh goose and gander, let me show you beat her over the head with them.
// FTFM

Jesterling: I was searching GIS for a good image of Fry so I could do a "burn!' thing. Sadly, I never made beyond page three because of this thing:

Er....

I'll be in my bunk.

Vacaboi: Hey, Subster, doesn't naming Lazio in the headline sort of give it away? That was a pretty high profile race, after all. Lazio was parodied on SNL, etc. (For some reason he was drinking milk. I'm not sure what that was a reference too. Maybe they were just implying that he looked like a little kid next to Hillary.)

If there was an answer on "Jeopardy!" about the race, "He was Hillary Clinton's 2000 opponent for Senate" would be a $2000 question.

Bored Horde: Bill_Wick's_Friend: EvilTwinSkipster: For all you young Obamaniacs out there who might be shocked at this...

This is politics as usual in America for over two hundred years.

Sorry to disappoint you.

I'm hardly "young" and while I hope to get the chance to vote for Obama for president I wouldn't use "maniac" to describe my enthusiasm for him as a candidate.

Ask yourself, however --- six months after the election when all the improprieties and bogus electoral rolls and financial shenanigains are revealed, who do you think will have more check marks in the "scandal" column? Barack or Hillary?

How many times in her life has Hillary had the suffix "-gate" attached to her personal or business or political dealings?

I hate it when people slap a -gate on something. Watergate wasn't even that big of a scandal, it was just the last nail in the coffin of an incredibly unpopular president.

It was also the last time the Media really did its job abdicated its non-partisan duty in outing government corruption throwing our President under the buss in an effective manner, insofar as I know as the agenda driven Mainstream Media tells me.

FTFY

Son_Dee:

This is what my man B-Rock needs to do at this stage in the game:

Obama: "No more Bushes, no more Clintons. Enough is enough."

/ FTW

Hillary a liar and hypocrite?

LandStander: Rick Lazio. There's a name I haven't heard in a while.

Heh. He's a lobbyist for the financial industry and an EVP at Chase now. Which probably means he spends all day writing checks to Chuck Schumer.

Man, what a putz that guy was. Spent the whole campaign out on Long Island reminding people that he wasn't Hillary Clinton while she was schlepping all over upstate learning the name and former industry of every piece of crap broken city up there, shaking hands and promising that the few people left could sell their milk at four bucks a gallon (which they can).

puffy999: I know you troll and don't pay attention, but I wanted to remind everyone how ignorant this post was regarding the Obamaniacs and their knowledge of history, as well as their opinions on the historic political game.

If I troll, which is not really accurate since I think trolls are only trying to grab attention without having a real stance on the issue, it is only a little. I do have a stance, all politicians are filthy scum-sucking sewer-dwelling rats who lie and would run over their own grandmother if it would help them get elected.

As a corollary to that belief I think the government that governs best governs least. I'm pro-gridlock. The less Congress and the President can do the better off I think the country will be.

I simply like to keep these points in everyone's mind. Right now the big sport seems to be attacking Hilary Clinton. And the attacks are being carried out for the most part by Obama's supporters. I just like to drop reminders here and there that contrary to his public image Obama is just another politician. His goals and his tactics used to achieve those goals are not so far removed from Clinton's or McCain's nor any other politician who has run for President.

/sorry for the length but I get tired of Obamaites who declare anyone who doesn't sing the highest praises for Obama a troll.

EvilTwinSkipster: Ceph: Doesn't make it acceptable or any less deplorable.

Not less deplorable for sure.

Less aceeptable, not so much. Mudslinging and dirty tactics have been part and parcel of the American political landscape since the early 19th century, even before. It has been acceptable all that time and will probably remain so as so often the winners of these contests use these tactics.

You know what was a major part of the American political landscape predating even the 19th century? Slavery. So remember, just becuase something is wrong doesn't mean we can get rid of it. It's been around too long for that.

I love Rick Lazio. Always have. I know that people think it's inappropriate and creepy, but I just think the man is an absolute dreamboat.

Hypocrisy in my Clinton? It's more likely than you think.

Bored Horde: I hate it when people slap a -gate on something. Watergate wasn't even that big of a scandal, it was just the last nail in the coffin of an incredibly unpopular president.

I hate it when people get history wrong. The break-in at the Democratic National Headquarters located in the Watergate hotel on June 17, 1972 started the process of unraveling the presidency of Nixon. Even as the scandal started to unfold Nixon won an enormous electoral landslide in 1972 only failing to carry one state and DC.

Watergate was not the final nail in the coffin for an unpopular President. It was the beginning of the undoing of a president who enjoyed enormous support but was too paranoid to know it.

Falcc

You know what was a major part of the American political landscape predating even the 19th century? Slavery. So remember, just becuase something is wrong doesn't mean we can get rid of it. It's been around too long for that.

Are you suggesting we pass a Constitutional Amendment banning mudslinging?

For a second a thought the headline was saying Hillary was the man in the costume.

Ya know, even though I plan on voting Barry if he wins, a part of me wants Hillary to get the nomination just to witness the immediate about face that would come from many..many...many..farkers.\

that's so not funny!

dude, you should bite your tongue right now

or your typing hand/toe

I think I'm in love with Pinko.

/distracted

SharkUW: I think I'm in love with Pinko.

/distracted

Totally.

But in other news, this is why it'd really be helpful if the campaign had a Farker on it. I'm sure Obama would use this shiat in two seconds flat. Or on something like Olbermann's show. HE'D definitely use it.

veedeevadeevoodee:
Obama: "No more Bushes, no more Clintons. Enough is enough."


Consider the fact that you have to be 50 years old this year to have ever gotten a presidential ballot without the name Clinton or Bush on it (1976 was the last one). Among those people not 50? Barack Obama. He was in high school the last time BushOrClinton wasn't on the ballot. And Bush very nearly was the VP choice in 76... that pushes Obama back to grade school.

Clonod: Falcc

You know what was a major part of the American political landscape predating even the 19th century? Slavery. So remember, just becuase something is wrong doesn't mean we can get rid of it. It's been around too long for that.

Are you suggesting we pass a Constitutional Amendment banning mudslinging?

Or we could start a civil war that decades later is attributed to ending mudslinging even though we're actually going to wage it for completely different reasons.

LandStander: Rick Lazio. There's a name I haven't heard in a while.



Better than that MILFy lady that ran against Hillary in '06 that coudnt continue her speech because she was missing one of the pages.

She kept stumbling along and asking her staff for the missing page. Just sank her whole campaign quicker than a Dean Scream.

Ex-Republican: For a second a thought the headline was saying Hillary was the man in the costume.


lmao, I thought I was the only one.

EvilTwinSkipster:

Mudslinging and dirty tactics have been part and parcel of the American political landscape since the early 19th century, even before. It has been acceptable all that time and will probably remain so as so often the winners of these contests use these tactics.

Ah, hell, mudslinging and dirty tactics have been part of politics ever since Og and Thror faced off to determine who would lead the tribe's mastodon hunt - the only difference is that they used real mud. Politics is about power, pure and simple. That's not always a bad thing, mind you - hell, someone has to be in charge, and it's not going to be some schmuck with a personality like Ed in Accounting; it's going to be someone with ambition to spare. If we're lucky, it's someone with vision and skills in equal measure to that ambition, but this is by no means assured. Politics is a blood sport - always has been, always will be.

EvilTwinSkipster:

I hate it when people get history wrong. The break-in at the Democratic National Headquarters located in the Watergate hotel on June 17, 1972 started the process of unraveling the presidency of Nixon. Even as the scandal started to unfold Nixon won an enormous electoral landslide in 1972 only failing to carry one state and DC.

Watergate was not the final nail in the coffin for an unpopular President. It was the beginning of the undoing of a president who enjoyed enormous support but was too paranoid to know it.

I don't generally agree with your opinions, but on the facts you're solid. This is exactly right.

veedeevadeevoodee: / FTW




"Reagan and Bush and then Reagan and Bush and then Bush and then Clinton and Clinton and Bush AGAIN!"


Amazing, there's only been a few years of my entire life that a Reagan, a Bush, or a Clinton hasn't been in the White House.

Now America, people, is the definition of a plutocracy.

If these primary elections don't result in the creation of a [HYPOCRITE] tag, nothing will.

the issue is that Bill is raking in huge bucks, and a good chunk of that is coming from foreigners. And Bill & Hill's money is comingled.

We don't have a right to know their finances -- they have no obligation to disclose beyond what senate ethics mandates.

we are not going to see her tax returns, people.

She's be wise just to admit that and put the story to bed. She's screwing up by leading us on.

anybody still wonder where that $5 million came from last month? It came from one of Bill's contributors -- possibly foreign. this is a huge loophole in the campaign finance laws.

rhiner: the issue is that Bill is raking in huge bucks, and a good chunk of that is coming from foreigners. And Bill & Hill's money is comingled.

We don't have a right to know their finances -- they have no obligation to disclose beyond what senate ethics mandates.

Are you farking kidding me? She's running for president! You have no right to financial privacy if you want that job.

we are not going to see her tax returns, people.

Well then we need to tell her that's unacceptable.

She's be wise just to admit that and put the story to bed. She's screwing up by leading us on.

She's screwed either way. There's obviously something that looks bad. And it looks bad if she doesn't release. Hazards of getting involved in dirty business.