If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.
Fark SearchWeb Fark

         more options... Create account

(Some Guy) Interesting Cuba demands U.S. return Guantanamo Bay so it can torture the terrorists there itself   (mathaba.net) divider line 45
More: Interesting  
•       •       •

1081 clicks; posted to Politics » on 15 Feb 2008 at 12:33 AM   |  Make this a Fark FavoriteFavorite    |   share: Share on OMGTWITTER WEB2.0share on StumbleUponshare on Facebook  more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!

45 Comments   (+0 »)


Fark.com's  Political Inclination Thermometric Analyzer:
Neutral 2.24% Fascist
Archived thread
 
skookum 2008-02-15 12:36:35 AM  
Actually, it's probably a better idea to relocate the operation to this country.

 
Fart_Machine 2008-02-15 12:36:57 AM  
Hey why not? We outsource everything else.

 
jon787 2008-02-15 12:42:57 AM  
M&M enterprises can provide both terrorists and torturers for your business needs!

/what is good for the company is good for all

 
Saiga410 2008-02-15 12:46:21 AM  
A deal is a deal, no takesies backsies.

 
bicentennialman 2008-02-15 12:48:32 AM  
Do we still pay them in gold?

 
Comrade438 2008-02-15 12:51:09 AM  
skookum: Actually, it's probably a better idea to relocate the operation to this country.

1/10. Where's skookum 2.0, liberal edition?

 
Saiga410 2008-02-15 12:52:37 AM  
No ironic tag?

 
Kurland 2008-02-15 12:53:05 AM  
Skookum has become rather boring as of late. I prefered the ranting idiot troll he used to be. It just doesn't seem like he is even trying anymore.

 
Anagrammer 2008-02-15 12:55:54 AM  
Son, we live in a world that has walls, and those walls have to be guarded by men with guns. Whose gonna do it? You? You, Lt. Weinburg? I have more responsibility here than you could possibly fathom. You weep for Santiago, and you curse the marines. You have that luxury. You have the luxury of not knowing what I know. That Santiago's death, while tragic, probably saved lives. And that my existence, while grotesque and incomprehensible to you, saves lives. I know deep down in places you dont talk about at parties, you don't want me on that wall, you need me on that wall. We use words like honor, code, loyalty. We use these words as the backbone of a life spent defending something. You use them as a punchline. I have neither the time nor the inclination to explain myself to a man who rises and sleeps under the blanket of the very freedom I provide, then question the manner in which I provide it. I prefer you said thank you, and went on your way, Otherwise, I suggest you pick up a weapon, and stand to post. Either way, I don't give a damn what you think you are entitled to!
www.razorfine.com

 
DisembodiedVoice 2008-02-15 01:04:46 AM  
Since he came to power Castro has refused to accept the annual lease payments on Guantanamo Bay.

Wow...when even Castro doesn't want your blood money, maybe you need to re-think the direction you're headed in.

 
adiabat [TotalFark] 2008-02-15 01:05:52 AM  
skookum: Actually, it's probably a better idea to relocate the operation to this country.

Are you out of your mind?

 
skookum 2008-02-15 01:07:14 AM  
I really see no need to rate my posts, and insinuating that I would bat for the liberal side is insulting.

Fine. You want exciting? There's going to be a real clean-up in this country when McCain's elected. It will become increasingly difficult to be a liberal in this society, and eventually, hopefully jeering idiots like you will be summarily dealt with.

So go ahead, enjoy your little party where you celebrate the death of this administration, but rest assured it's going to live on. And the changes are going to start here.

The truth is that there are facilities being built in the American West, yes, by Halliburton, and although at first it will house the illegal immigrants being processed and deported, they will be then sufficiently broken in for the next round of domestic dissidents. And this is coming in the next few years no matter who's in office.

 
hankhorsey 2008-02-15 01:07:42 AM  
Saiga410: A deal is a deal, no takesies backsies.

The U.S. leases Guantanamo for $2,000/year. They also violate the terms of the lease, which specify that the U.S. can use it as a coaling station for ships. What would you do if Uncle Sam was wouldn't get out of your basement?

 
FarkFish 2008-02-15 01:08:33 AM  
Guantanamera..... guajira.... Guantanamera ....


Link (new window)

 
Zenken13 [TotalFark] 2008-02-15 01:08:58 AM  
When I was growing up, I was always confused by that whole thing.

"Why don't they just jack the lease and boot us out?"

Ah, kids.

 
skookum 2008-02-15 01:12:43 AM  
adiabat: Are you out of your mind?

No,I assure you, but keeping in mind that there are terror cells in this country just waiting to be activated indicates that much of the processing will occur in this country, which, I may add, could include other dissenting domestic elements.

 
quizybuck 2008-02-15 01:20:37 AM  
They owe us. If we hadn't liberated them from Spain, they'd still be speaking Spanish now.

 
POAC [TotalFark] 2008-02-15 01:35:05 AM  
skookum:
No,I assure you, but keeping in mind that there are terror cells in this country just waiting to be activated indicates that much of the processing will occur in this country, which, I may add, could include other dissenting domestic elements.

Translation: "I'm so skeered!!!!!"

 
skookum 2008-02-15 01:44:45 AM  
Yes, go ahead and laugh, it's par for the course, but when New York, Chicago and Los Angeles are in ruins after a successful detonation, you'll wish we had every phone line in America accounted for.

See, this is the difference between the real world, and Fark liberals acting like monkeys when confronted with the reality of this situation. It's almost amusing, and it's why a Republican will stay in the White House.

 
BitwiseShift 2008-02-15 01:47:50 AM  
Maybe we could lease Miami to Cuba for $5000 a year? You know, as a gesture of good will. Or maybe DC. Even better.

 
40oz_A_Knight 2008-02-15 01:51:53 AM  
BitwiseShift: Or maybe DC. Even better.

DC municipal government employees already have the inefficiency and apathy characteristic of socialist employment, so the transition will be easy.

 
Argh2 2008-02-15 01:54:03 AM  
skookum: I really see no need to rate my posts, and insinuating that I would bat for the liberal side is insulting.

Fine. You want exciting? There's going to be a real clean-up in this country when McCain's elected. It will become increasingly difficult to be a liberal in this society, and eventually, hopefully jeering idiots like you will be summarily dealt with.

So go ahead, enjoy your little party where you celebrate the death of this administration, but rest assured it's going to live on. And the changes are going to start here.

The truth is that there are facilities being built in the American West, yes, by Halliburton, and although at first it will house the illegal immigrants being processed and deported, they will be then sufficiently broken in for the next round of domestic dissidents. And this is coming in the next few years no matter who's in office.


And yet you claim liberals are paranoid crazies?

If we take you at your word, then Liberals have been right about EVERYTHING, and Republicans are the ones living in a fools paradise..

 
Aarontology [TotalFark] 2008-02-15 01:55:02 AM  
skookum: Yes, go ahead and laugh, it's par for the course, but when New York, Chicago and Los Angeles are in ruins after a successful detonation, you'll wish we had every phone line in America accounted for.

Hmm. You seem to know some specifics about some upcoming plans. Perhaps you are showing your hand there skookum, or should I call you Osama? I can see why you would want the GOP in power. They will continue the policies that get you and your suicide bomber buddies more recruits. I'm on to you.

 
Argh2 2008-02-15 02:00:30 AM  
skookum: Yes, go ahead and laugh, it's par for the course, but when New York, Chicago and Los Angeles are in ruins after a successful detonation, you'll wish we had every phone line in America accounted for.

See, this is the difference between the real world, and Fark liberals acting like monkeys when confronted with the reality of this situation. It's almost amusing, and it's why a Republican will stay in the White House.



I would hope that if we ever are attacked so devastatingly, we have a real leader who doesn't see the event as an excuse for dissolving the country. Call me a patriot that way.

 
Arthur Jumbles [TotalFark] 2008-02-15 02:22:49 AM  
DisembodiedVoice: Since he came to power Castro has refused to accept the annual lease payments on Guantanamo Bay.

He cashed the first one and we've used that as proof that his new government accepted the terms of the lease made by the previous administration.

 
thisispete [TotalFark] 2008-02-15 03:02:16 AM  
Arthur Jumbles: DisembodiedVoice: Since he came to power Castro has refused to accept the annual lease payments on Guantanamo Bay.

He cashed the first one and we've used that as proof that his new government accepted the terms of the lease made by the previous administration.


Yes but the United States has breached at least one term of the lease:

ARTICLE III

The United States of America agrees that no person, partnership, or corporation shall be permitted to establish or maintain a commercial, industrial or other enterprise within said areas.


There is a McDonalds, among other fast-food enterprises, on the base.

 
cryptozoophiliac 2008-02-15 03:57:23 AM  
skookum: Yes, go ahead and laugh, it's par for the course, but when New York, Chicago and Los Angeles are in ruins after a successful detonation, you'll wish we had every phone line in America accounted for.

See, this is the difference between the real world, and Fark liberals acting like monkeys when confronted with the reality of this situation. It's almost amusing, and it's why a Republican will stay in the White House.


If you know of a credible threat to these cities, you are obliged to report it at once to the authorities. If you choose not to, please consider yourself informed that your contact information has in fact been forwarded to DHS.

 
nictamer 2008-02-15 04:24:27 AM  
thisispete: Yes but the United States has breached at least one term of the lease:

ARTICLE III

The United States of America agrees that no person, partnership, or corporation shall be permitted to establish or maintain a commercial, industrial or other enterprise within said areas.

There is a McDonalds, among other fast-food enterprises, on the base.


Contractual obligations only apply to the US government when it benefits them. Take the Geneva convention. Iraq recklessly broke it by broadcasting pictures of US war prisoners at the beginning of Operation Iraqi Liberation (O.I.L., its original title, no kidding). It's a grave violation. Gitmo, if it were operated by any other country, would be an abhorrent violation. But since it's the US's, it's fine & dandy.

 
Cyber_Junk 2008-02-15 05:43:55 AM  
quizybuck Quote 2008-02-15 01:20:37 AM
They owe us. If we hadn't liberated them from Spain, they'd still be speaking Spanish now.



(sigh)

Lemme guess, you also post "We saved your asses in WW2" in discussions involving Europe.

 
Alien Robot 2008-02-15 05:46:33 AM  
thisispete: There is a McDonalds, among other fast-food enterprises, on the base.

Those aren't commercial enterprises because they are closed to Cubans. If Cubans could eat there in competition to Cuban restaurants, you might have a point. But as is, it's no different than any other method of feeding the American sailors and their families who are assigned there.

 
Alien Robot 2008-02-15 06:02:15 AM  
hankhorsey: The U.S. leases Guantanamo for $2,000/year. They also violate the terms of the lease, which specify that the U.S. can use it as a coaling station for ships.

The lease says it can be used as a coaling station for ships OR a naval station.

 
spill_thrill 2008-02-15 06:28:54 AM  
Cyber_Junk: Lemme guess, you also post "We saved your asses in WW2" in discussions involving Europe.

Psssst, what languange do you think they speak in Cuba now? ;)

 
PC LOAD LETTER [TotalFark] 2008-02-15 07:27:55 AM  
nictamer: Operation Iraqi Liberation (O.I.L., its original title, no kidding)

Wow. I never caught that.

 
navylostboy 2008-02-15 07:51:10 AM  
skookum: Yes, go ahead and laugh, it's par for the course, but when New York, Chicago and Los Angeles are in ruins after a successful detonation, you'll wish we had every phone line in America accounted for.

See, this is the difference between the real world, and Fark liberals acting like monkeys when confronted with the reality of this situation. It's almost amusing, and it's why a Republican will stay in the White House.


Because all the hardline Dictatorship type governments, where its people have no privacy rights, or even a Bill of rights are all perfectly safe places to live and work every day!

Yup!

/nothing to see heren move along
/obligitory "people who surender rights...deserve neither..." look it up

 
proteus_b 2008-02-15 08:17:54 AM  
skookum if you aren't crazy, or a troll, then perhaps you could explain why none of the other successful nations in the world live in a sci-fi future police state like you love to describe so much?

 
equilibrium 2008-02-15 08:20:26 AM  
skookum: I really see no need to rate my posts, and insinuating that I would bat for the liberal side is insulting.

You should be careful as trolling like that too frequently wears a groove in your mind. Every time it's a little easier to get into character and maybe a little harder to take off the mask. Imperceptible at first but best to be careful. Ignorance and bigotry, even in jest, can become a habit.

 
Johann65 2008-02-15 10:33:12 AM  
Ah, I see a bigger problem with the lease. It was signed by "The President of the United States of America, Herbert G. Squiers, Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary in Havana."

/Surprised the Cubans haven't picked up on that one yet
//Shhhhhhh!!! Don't tell them

 
eich 2008-02-15 10:41:39 AM  
Darius Harris: FTFA: Cuba rejects "the violation of human rights, unjust incarceration of prisoners held there without charges, and their appearance in courts without guarantees and in which they are convicted in advance,' he told reporters.


Comedy gold.


When I read FTA, I thought the same thing.

 
obz 2008-02-15 10:41:44 AM  
Skookum is still around! You guys all realize he is just a fark cliche right? He's here strictly for entertainment purposes.

 
randomjsa 2008-02-15 10:55:49 AM  
Always amusing when communist dictators positions are indistinguishable from liberals.

 
dittybopper [recently expired TotalFark] 2008-02-15 11:16:00 AM  
hankhorsey: Saiga410: A deal is a deal, no takesies backsies.

The U.S. leases Guantanamo for $2,000/year. They also violate the terms of the lease, which specify that the U.S. can use it as a coaling station for ships. What would you do if Uncle Sam was wouldn't get out of your basement?


No, we don't violate the terms of the agreement. This is the text of the argeement:

ARTICLE I

The Republic of Cuba hereby leases to the United States, for the time required for the purposes of coaling and naval stations, the following described areas of land and water situated in the Island of Cuba:


It then goes on to define the area affected.

ARTICLE II

The grant of the foregoing Article shall include the right to use and occupy the waters adjacent to said areas of land and water, and to improve and deepen the entrances thereto and the anchorages therein, and generally to do any and all things necessary to fit the premises for use as coaling or naval stations only, and for no other purpose.


One could argue that pretty much all naval stations have detention facilities, so the detainees at Gitmo are legal under the agreement because you will find a brig on every naval base in the World.

You can read the full agreement here:

Agreement Between the United States and Cuba for the Lease of Lands for Coaling and Naval stations; February 23, 1903


By the way, I had no idea if you were correct or not, so I actually went ahead and read the agreement. By it's terms, we are using the naval base there as a naval base, along with all the ancillary functions that go along with a naval base.

You, along with Castro, might not like it, but there is no violation of the agreement that I can see.

 
hankhorsey 2008-02-15 11:30:00 AM  
dittybopper:


By the way, I had no idea if you were correct or not, so I actually went ahead and read the agreement. By it's terms, we are using the naval base there as a naval base, along with all the ancillary functions that go along with a naval base.

You, along with Castro, might not like it, but there is no violation of the agreement that I can see.


Actually, I was wrong about the $2,000/year too--they upped it to $4,000 and change some time in the '20s or '30s. I feel a lot better now, and am eager to do business with the plain dealing U.S. government.

 
dittybopper [recently expired TotalFark] 2008-02-15 11:37:00 AM  
thisispete: Arthur Jumbles: DisembodiedVoice: Since he came to power Castro has refused to accept the annual lease payments on Guantanamo Bay.

He cashed the first one and we've used that as proof that his new government accepted the terms of the lease made by the previous administration.

Yes but the United States has breached at least one term of the lease:

ARTICLE III

The United States of America agrees that no person, partnership, or corporation shall be permitted to establish or maintain a commercial, industrial or other enterprise within said areas.

There is a McDonalds, among other fast-food enterprises, on the base.


Which are limited to selling their goods to the people on the post.

The idea behind that was to prevent commercial activity that would spill out from the base, ie., if someone started manufacturing clothing at Gitmo, and selling it to Cubans. Essentially, it is there to protect the Cuban economy. A sailor being able to buy a Big Mac in no way threatens Cuba economically.

Besides which, a lot of functions that were solely military are now outsourced, including things like managing dining facilities. Under a strict interpretation of Article III of the supplemental agreement, even those wouldn't be allowed. You couldn't even permit a sailor or Marine to make money sewing on patches, shining boots, or cutting hair in their spare time. They are after all individuals, and doing that stuff for money is a commercial enterprise.

 
quizybuck 2008-02-15 02:09:08 PM  
Cyber_Junk: quizybuck Quote 2008-02-15 01:20:37 AM
They owe us. If we hadn't liberated them from Spain, they'd still be speaking Spanish now.


(sigh)

Lemme guess, you also post "We saved your asses in WW2" in discussions involving Europe.


Wow, did you really not catch that as being sarcastic?

(sigh)

 
quatchi 2008-02-15 03:15:05 PM  
skookum: I really see no need to rate my posts, and insinuating that I would bat for the liberal side is insulting.

Fine. You want exciting? There's going to be a real clean-up in this country when McCain's elected. It will become increasingly difficult to be a liberal in this society, and eventually, hopefully jeering idiots like you will be summarily dealt with.

So go ahead, enjoy your little party where you celebrate the death of this administration, but rest assured it's going to live on. And the changes are going to start here.

The truth is that there are facilities being built in the American West, yes, by Halliburton, and although at first it will house the illegal immigrants being processed and deported, they will be then sufficiently broken in for the next round of domestic dissidents. And this is coming in the next few years no matter who's in office.


That's some mighty fine trolling, Lou.

Has Helliburton built a series of detention facilities in the US largely unreported by the MSM?

Check.

Operation Power Geyser? Granite Shadow? Uh-huh.

Has BushCo signed executive orders giving him sole authority to impose martial law, suspend habeas corpus and ignore the Posse Comitatus Act that prohibits deployment of U.S. troops on American streets? Yup. Will this give him absolute dictatorial power over the government with no checks and balances? Double check!

Is Quatchi worried about any of this stuff? Not particularily.

Is Quatchi aware that this is just the US government doing on it's own soil what it has facilitated happening in so many other places on this earth?

Again with the yeah-huh.

Skookum looks forward to the day when librul scum are cleansed in purifying flames of conservative rightiousness?

Ha! Quatchi just laffs at him.

Would explain all that but it's funner this way. Trust me.

On Topic?

When a human rights abuser like Castro tells you to pack up yer torture tools and go home maybe you'd best consider it. The American blockade and sanctions of Cuba is an immoral act that is long past it's "best before" date. The cynical politics behind it's endless continuation have more to do with neither party wanting to piss off the large Cubano ex-pat vote in FLA (a notorious swing state) than any real security reasons, in case you were wondering.

 
Displayed 45 of 45 comments


[Continue Farking]