If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.
Fark SearchWeb Fark

         more options... Create account

(YouTube) Sappy The Beatles' "I Wanna Hold Your Hand" turns out to be a sad song, after all   (youtube.com) divider line 35
More: Sappy  
•       •       •

2412 clicks; posted to Music » on 09 Feb 2008 at 3:46 AM   |  Make this a Fark FavoriteFavorite    |   share: Share on OMGTWITTER WEB2.0share on StumbleUponshare on Facebook  more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!

35 Comments   (+0 »)


Archived thread
 
Brettster808 [TotalFark] 2008-02-09 02:46:35 AM  
They took a sad song, and made it better, better, better...

 
El Freak [TotalFark] 2008-02-09 02:53:28 AM  
This movie looks like pure grade-A crap.

 
Confabulat [TotalFark] 2008-02-09 03:20:39 AM  
El Freak: This movie looks like pure grade-A crap.

Dude, it's a musical. The great ones are always the worst ones.

 
theurge14 2008-02-09 03:59:18 AM  
Everything looks cooler when it's filmed in slow motion.

 
whitxcore 2008-02-09 04:03:23 AM  
Yah great soundtrack but the movie was 3 hours of pain

 
padraig 2008-02-09 04:57:46 AM  
El Freak: This movie looks like pure grade-A crap.

Seen it, it wasn't. At least to my tast.

And, although I loved how they repurposed most of the song, this one came to me as the perfect example of repurposing a song. "I want you (she's so heavy)" was also perfect in that regard, as a recruiting song the US Army.

 
cryptozoophiliac 2008-02-09 05:36:08 AM  
Man I hate that warbly R&B vocal style that every chick under the age of 30 feels obliged to adopt...

 
Christian Bale 2008-02-09 05:47:28 AM  
cryptozoophiliac Quote 2008-02-09 05:36:08 AM
Man I hate that warbly R&B vocal style that every chick under the age of 30 feels obliged to adopt...


she doesn't add any warbles that the Beatles didn't already put there. Maybe you hate her tone but that's a different thing altogether (now).

 
Darth_Lukecash [TotalFark] 2008-02-09 06:57:02 AM  
Okay, like was she singing to the cheerleader or the football player?

Cause if it was the cheerleader, then its a tragic lesbian romance.

If it was the football player, then it's stupid broad whining.

/Hoping for the cheerleader on cheerleader action!
//Save the lesbian, save the movie!

 
cryptozoophiliac 2008-02-09 07:54:53 AM  
Christian Bale: cryptozoophiliac Quote 2008-02-09 05:36:08 AM
Man I hate that warbly R&B vocal style that every chick under the age of 30 feels obliged to adopt...

she doesn't add any warbles that the Beatles didn't already put there. Maybe you hate her tone but that's a different thing altogether (now).


Actually, I listened to the whole thing, and she has a nice tone. In one sense, she brings more actual meaning to the song than it originally had.

Could be however that I'm not much of a fan of Beatles covers.

(Exceptions: Ella Fitzgerald's cover of "Savoy Truffle", Los Lobos live cover of "Tomorrow Never Knows", Earth Wind and Fire's "Got to Get You in to My Life".)

 
theurge14 2008-02-09 08:49:47 AM  
Christian Bale: cryptozoophiliac Quote 2008-02-09 05:36:08 AM
Man I hate that warbly R&B vocal style that every chick under the age of 30 feels obliged to adopt...

she doesn't add any warbles that the Beatles didn't already put there. Maybe you hate her tone but that's a different thing altogether (now).


I just listened to both. The cheerleader version sounds like she almost graduated from the Christina Aguilera school of vocal styling. She had the croaking from silence into a soft note down pat, and also the sloppy scooping into a note (aka inexperience). All she needs is to replace more of the longer sustained notes with more scales and she'll have Aguilera down perfectly.

 
MetalSwanson 2008-02-09 10:40:42 AM  
Across the Universe entertained me. The soundtrack was great and a most of the musical sequences were fantastic. But the parts in between the music left a lot to be desired.


Overall, not a terrible movie.

 
barefoot in the head [TotalFark] 2008-02-09 11:05:11 AM  
"iiiIII think you'll understand" - She's got that phony cigarettes and whiskey grind goin' on.

Only thing worse is the McLachlan/Morissette yodel.

 
mfaby 2008-02-09 11:28:50 AM  
What a bunch of crappy, crap, crap.

I, for one, am sick of the deification of the Beatles and John Lennon particularly.

 
artman 2008-02-09 11:29:27 AM  
I'll take the bobblehead version...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0GqQHHNPglE

/smithereens
//meh

 
hemi cuda 2008-02-09 12:00:11 PM  
that was awful

 
Stupid Guitar 2008-02-09 12:14:14 PM  
Yeah, but does it surpass this Beatles musical in cheese?


Link (new window)

 
Chuck Cunningham 2008-02-09 12:17:02 PM  
She was singing to the cheerleader. I saw the movie and overall I would say mediocre script, great music.

 
TheSkill05 2008-02-09 02:55:29 PM  
I'm a huge fan of The Beatles and in general I hate covers, but I absolutely loved this movie and the musical performances. Evan Rachael Wood does phenomenal versions of "Blackbird" and "If I Fell." The version of "Let It Be" done in the movie almost brought me to tears. It's a great movie worth seeing over and over.

 
RockIsDead 2008-02-09 04:45:21 PM  
Started out too whinny but got a bit better.

 
somedude210 [TotalFark] 2008-02-09 07:15:31 PM  
like the movie, one of the only musicals i enjoyed (along with the new producers and RENT)

I kinda wished they included Sgt Peppers or LSD or I Saw Her Standing There in the beginning.

 
RoyBatty 2008-02-09 08:39:24 PM  
Does it make it more interesting when you find out that the "girl" singing, Prudence, is a T.V. in real life?

 
dbraun 2008-02-09 11:25:20 PM  
I've never seen this movie and hope I never do. Every outtake gives me the impression that it would be painful to sit through. I would probably want to slit my wrists before the movie is over -- that's after I finished jabbing an icepick through my eardrums so I couldn't hear anymore crappy versions of great songs.

 
Beatles1964t 2008-02-10 02:14:09 AM  
TheSkill05: I'm a huge fan of The Beatles and in general I hate covers, but I absolutely loved this movie and the musical performances. Evan Rachael Wood does phenomenal versions of "Blackbird" and "If I Fell." The version of "Let It Be" done in the movie almost brought me to tears. It's a great movie worth seeing over and over.

THIS, a million times this.

This song, however, did *not* need to be included in the film. Totally cringe-worthy.

 
luckybastard 2008-02-10 09:14:37 AM  
mfaby: What a bunch of crappy, crap, crap.

I, for one, am sick of the deification of the Beatles and John Lennon particularly.


OMG the beatles and john lennon were GADS, I say, GADS!

 
magicalOne 2008-02-10 10:27:35 AM  
i hate that freakin' britney spears-esque constipated sound that female singers think they need to make today. you know which on i'm talking about?

just like mariah made everyone think they needed to sing gospel.

 
Chastain86 2008-02-10 10:57:19 AM  
I'm not an overly reverent Beatles fan, so I'm really not sure whether or not I'll like this movie more or less for that fact.

It looks like Moulin Rouge only with Beatles songs. That's not exactly a selling point.

Neither is this clip.

 
radioman_ 2008-02-10 05:09:57 PM  
Mr. Skin told me T.V. Carpio was naked in Sucker Free City.

There were some great county covers of Beatles tunes. A particular fave is the Dillards doing I've Just Seen A Face. The Dillards played the Darlings on Andy Griffith in many of the episodes with Ernest T. Bass.

Country singer Baby Bare does an incredible cover of The Last Time by the Stones. Hard to find but worth a listen. Those English boys were heavily influenced by American country music and it shows.

 
hecticthe13th 2008-02-10 06:40:26 PM  
so yeah...this is super, super farkin' old news.
the DVD just came out; the movie was released to theatres like, what, last summer?

Secondly, since i see some doubters--Across the Universe not only did not suck, but in fact ranks among one of the best movies of 2007. Don't criticise it until you've seen it.

 
hecticthe13th 2008-02-10 06:43:12 PM  
Also--it's worth noting that while this song was good, it was by far no where near the best song on the soundtrack--find a clip of "I want you," or "oh!darling," and you'll see why this movie is so great.

 
LindenFark 2008-02-10 11:37:25 PM  
I have a great deal of respect for The Beatles, but to be honest, their early stuff was well executed but not significantly better than say, Herman's Hermits. Good, but not great.

This cover adds something to the song. I don't regret listening to it.

 
karmachameleon 2008-02-10 11:49:03 PM  
You detractors honestly don't get it. Think of it as a tribute to the great original music, rather than "crappy covers". It's a very well-done soundtrack, and perfectly in the spirit of paying respect to the original masterpieces.

As for the movie overall, it's a matter of taste. I enjoyed it as a creative visual and aural experience, and didn't think of it as a "narrative" movie. I can easily see why others wouldn't like it.

 
Passive Aggressive Larry [TotalFark] 2008-02-11 01:08:26 AM  
mfaby: What a bunch of crappy, crap, crap.

I, for one, am sick of the deification of the Beatles and John Lennon particularly.


Its tough not to deify rock gods. Really, whos is more deserving of rock deification than farking john lennon?

 
The Unthinking Majority 2008-02-11 01:39:21 AM  
How can you not like this song? (new window)


Absolutely beautiful...

 
CatJumpJohn 2008-02-11 09:35:08 AM  
LindenFark: I have a great deal of respect for The Beatles, but to be honest, their early stuff was well executed but not significantly better than say, Herman's Hermits. Good, but not great.

I think you might be wrong.

 
Displayed 35 of 35 comments


[Continue Farking]