if anyone knows about jizz, it's miss sludge.

I remember that post. We discussed it and wondered if Newsweek's spiking of the story would hold.

There is no justice in a world where Elvis is dead while Drudge is famous.

Thank God for Drudge, or this travesty of justice, this very crime against the American people and the Constitution, would have gone un-noticed.

NeauxFear: There is no justice in a world where Elvis is dead ever played anywhere while Drudge is famous.


/Flame on

ha. Clinton got a BLOWJOB.

Actually he was being investigated for 12 counts of sexual assault and harrassment, and documenting a history of affairs with subordinates is deemed relevant evidence in trial. Somehow that part is usually skipped over.

Freeper_Madness

Did they finally ban your other account? Took them long enough, I thought they'd just given up after you kept making new ones.

chu2dogg: Actually he was being investigated for 12 counts of sexual assault and harrassment, and documenting a history of affairs with subordinates is deemed relevant evidence in trial. Somehow that part is usually skipped over.


Keep reaching.

And the site format hasn't changed since.

Wow, that all happened in a year? I could have sworn a good five years of my life was spent following that story and O.J. Simpson.

The media have powers.

chu2dogg: Actually he was being investigated for 12 counts of sexual assault and harrassment, and documenting a history of affairs with subordinates is deemed relevant evidence in trial. Somehow that part is usually skipped over.

Tell me, what did the judge in the case think about the relevance of the Lewinsky matter? Somehow you seem to have skipped over that part.

I mean the case is said and done, so instead of speculating about its relevance why not just state if it was considered relevant or not? What possible reason could there be to leave out that information and include speculation instead?

And so was born one of the major facts that proves media political bias.

Does anyone think Newsweek would spike that story if it was Bush?

I also remember the media going after Newt Gingrich shortly there after and dragging independent prosecuter Ken Starr through the mud.

MilesTeg: And so was born one of the major facts that proves media political bias.

Does anyone think Newsweek would spike that story if it was Bush?

I also remember the media going after Newt Gingrich shortly there after and dragging independent prosecuter Ken Starr through the mud.


So much stupid in one post.

boomaze: So much stupid in one post.

its like Drudge himself has a fark account.

But he still has the same hat.

I love how a decade later, Drudge is still lambasted by the 'angry left'. Isn't that how MoveOn.org was started in the first place? To 'move on' past the impeachment?

You know, it was because of the Monica Lewinsky ordeal that we even have Hillary Clinton as a contender for the presidency today; the Republicans were involved in a witch hunt which she characterized as the 'vast, right-wing conspiracy'. Well, groups on the left (such as MoveOn) caught on and started becoming incredibly angry at the 'right wing' conspirators. Some might say that the only reason she even became a senator was because the liberal state of New York wanted to 'stick it' to the Republicans and were more than happy to invite her in as a carpetbagger. Now, she's lining herself up to make a serious presidential run where chances are she could win.

Wouldn't that be just desserts though? Republicans grasp straws to attack a political enemy and end up losing the presidency to that man's wife because of it. My, the webs we weave...

Matt Drudge: The man who called Congressional pages "beasts" during the Mark Foley scandal.

Matt, stay classy.

m2313: /Flame on

Hehehe. Now stop ruining TotalFa...oh. Nevermind then; carry on.

;)

Quick, name the only TWO U.S. Presidents ever to be impeached!

torquestripe: Quick, name the only TWO U.S. Presidents ever to be impeached!

Clinton and Johnson right? What do I win?

XSLUMLORDX: And the site format hasn't changed since.

that's because his readers aren't mature enough to get over it.

luckybastard: Wow, that all happened in a year? I could have sworn a good five years of my life was spent following that story and O.J. Simpson.

The media have powers.

Oh, the special investigation into the Clintons started almost as soon as Bill took office, into alleged real estate improprities and sexual harassment and so forth. So they'd been going on a good four years at the point when this particular scandal broke. The Clinton presidency was basically wall-to-wall scandals, some real, some manufactured. Monicagate was just the climax, if you will.

oral history

I'd still vote for him again if he could run.

Suck it bushie boys.

Shaggy_C: torquestripe: Quick, name the only TWO U.S. Presidents ever to be impeached!

Clinton and Johnson right? What do I win?

Nothing!

But thanks for playing.

chu2dogg: Actually he was being investigated for 12 counts of sexual assault and harrassment, and documenting a history of affairs with subordinates is deemed relevant evidence in trial. Somehow that part is usually skipped over.

If it wasn't about sex, no one would have gave a crap. You know it. I know it.

rppp01a: I'd still vote for him again if he could run.

Suck it bushie boys.

As would most Americans. On one hand, thank god the President can only serve two terms or we might never be rid of Bush. On the other hand, if the limit wasn't there we still might have Clinton.

Since polling started, Clinton is one of only two Presidents that ended their term with higher approval ratings than when they started. FDR was the other one.

See, this was back in the days when members of the press QUESTIONED the actions of our elected officials no matter WHAT letter appeared next to their name.

So basically, nothing happened 10 years ago today.

SusanIvanova: the special investigation into the Clintons started almost as soon as Bill took office

But of course, there wasn't any kind of witch hunt taking place...

Ragnarok: I remember that post. We discussed it and wondered if Newsweek's spiking of the story would hold.

Damn, if you'd just used a little more foresight you coulda been in Matt shoes today.

Guess ya blew it.

Close but no cigar.

/Will stop now

Monica Lewensky's Ex-Boyfriend's Wife for President

worlddan: rppp01a: I'd still vote for him again if he could run.

Suck it bushie boys.

As would most Americans. On one hand, thank god the President can only serve two terms or we might never be rid of Bush. On the other hand, if the limit wasn't there we still might have Clinton.

Since polling started, Clinton is one of only two Presidents that ended their term with higher approval ratings than when they started. FDR was the other one.

And Clinton never did get a majority of the popular vote...

You have to be seriously farked up to have nostalgic feelings for the Clinton impeachment. It made everyone involved look like an asshole, and destroyed any respect my generation might have had for the office of president. And for what? So Republicans could score some temporary political points?

What a crock of shiat. If Drudge had been hit by a bus the day before posting that story, the world would be a better place right now.

So much stupid in one post.

Such a cunning retort! You must be correct.


...funny how the truth burns libtards

MilesTeg: libtards

Gnarly to the max, dog.

You do know it's 2008, right?

RIP Linda Tripp

Drudge was already a pretty big deal by that point. He may not have been a household name in middle America, but if you used the internet on a daily basis, you were probably checking Drudge's website occassionally by then.

I remember when the story hit his site - it caused a monumental stir (as you might imagine) on Free Republic. In my opinion, it was incredibly important because it was the first time I can remember that at least 50% of the country (the internet using public) knew about a major news story, but the mainstream media stuck their fingers in their ears and went "la, la, la, la, la ... we can't hear you" and just pretended it didn't exist. The mainstream media had ignored major stories in the past (FDR's health, JFK's sleeping around, etc), but this was the first time the general public just went right around them and reported the story to itself (via the internet).

NBC, ABC, CBS, The New York Times, the Washington Post, Time and Newsweek probably lost half their influence overnight.

And ten years later we're waiting for this broken clock to strike again

Drudge is probably celebrating right now by rubbing raw eggs all over his boy-toy Breit Bart...

/NTTAWWT

Freerepublic?

http://www.freerepublic.com/home.htm :

Welcome to Free Republic!
Free Republic is the premier online gathering place for independent, grass-roots conservatism on the web. We're working to roll back decades of governmental largesse, to root out political fraud and corruption, and to champion causes which further conservatism in America. And we always have fun doing it. Hoo-yah!


Sounds like a plan.

Just to clarify, the previous post was the response I got on a different site when I accused someone of being a Freeper, word for word.

Apparently, I hit a nerve, I don't know.