snuff kink

stay classy, Florida

/in before "useless w/o pics"
//embiggened version here
///pops

Momma always told me about wearing clean underwear in case of a crash but never once did she say I had to wear a bra!

In the letter, Shirk said he takes photos at every major fire and accident scene. He called the photos "invaluable spankin' it material" and said they were e-mailed for that purpose.

sounds open and shut to me.

and this is a bad thing?

She was a literal "butherface"?

If she hadn't wanted people to see them, they would have been covered.

King Something: /in before "useless w/o pics"
//embiggened version here
///pops

Thanks for that. Time for a grilled cheese sammich.

That guy is a complete piece of shiat. That ass takes and sends dirty pics of helpless people. Hope he never works in the morgue. (BTW the girl died)

rawsta: stay classy, Florida

I came in here to say that.

If I were related to the crash victim, I'm afraid I'd take a few pictures after cockpunching him.

Ouch!! how drunk was she.

/it really is the picture for every thread

That pic is really startin to freak me out tkfourtwo1, it has followed me from thread to thread for far too long today...

Got a name of the woman?

IronTom: That guy is a complete piece of shiat. That ass takes and sends dirty pics of helpless people. Hope he never works in the morgue. (BTW the girl died)

Jeebus christ. First the insurance people want pictures of the crash and the victim. Then the victim says they don't want the pictures taken, because they might expose them in an unflattering position.

You people spin my head.

Crash Victims Gone Wild
order now and you get
Naughty Parapleigic Rehab Center

/seriously though who does that kinda stuff
\is my slashie going the wrong way?
\/\/\/

I'll take sappy seconds!

/I'm so going to hell.

You know this never would have happened without the internet

Got airbags?

starsrift: e victim says they don't want the pictures taken, because they might expose them in an unflattering position.

You people spin my head.

OK, maybe he was completely legit. Maybe the news people spun it out of proportion.

And where is this pic?

C'mon Farkistan, don't let me down!!

It seems some people will forever be unaware that there is an internets, recording everything they do.

/ttiuwp

Scummy firefighers trifecta in play?

i will make this quick, but why is there no link to the new hampshire debates or at least some type of drinking game?

Fire departments do, indeed, take pictures of fires, water rescues, MCI's, etc. for training purposes. Some remain in-house, some get circulated to sister departments, and some photos are submitted to professional fire magazines (Fire Engineering, Fire Rescue, etc.). It all comes down to intent. Was the purpose of the email for education or titillation? If the fire chief can prove that he has emailed pictures from previous incidents to enhance the education of other departments, then he may have a hydrant to stand on.

Otherwise, he's just Shirking his duties.

/titillation
//titillation
///I said titillation
////ha, said it again

labman: If she hadn't wanted people to see them, they would have been covered.

Anyone ever take the moment to stop think that maybe she wasn't driving topless? That maybe they had to remove her shirt in order to get to an injury she got from the accident?

did the paramedics cut her top off to treat her wounds, or was she driving around topless and had a wreck?? I think it's great that some women want to drive around topless, but if you do, to hell with your right to privacy. no one's violating anything by snapping pics.

I'll bet that's a lovely, forward thinking group of friends you've got gathered that CC-line there, Chief.

PTA types. Pillars of the community.

Why is everyone so sure what he did was wrong? Distributing this to all the departments adds credence to his story, if you had a kink like that you would keep it to yourself.

Journalistic integrity is what's at question here, they didn't check for precedent or anything of the sort.

And you people are FAR too quick to hate.

It's good to be the chief.

Somebody should take a picture of his hose.
See how he likes it.

I think this case hinges on whether the email contained 400 pictures and was titled "Training Photos, November 2008" or it contained 3 photos and was titled "Dead biatch Topless".

By the looks of the accident photos (slideshow link on page) I can't believe she was alive when they pulled her out.

TrixieDelite: Fire departments do, indeed, take pictures of fires, water rescues, MCI's, etc. for training purposes. Some remain in-house, some get circulated to sister departments, and some photos are submitted to professional fire magazines (Fire Engineering, Fire Rescue, Firehouse Hussies, Pole Sliding Monthly, etc.). It all comes down to intent. Was the purpose of the email for education or titillation? If the fire chief can prove that he has emailed pictures from previous incidents to enhance the education of other departments, then he may have a hydrant to stand on.

Otherwise, he's just Shirking his duties.

/titillation
//titillation
///I said titillation
////ha, said it again

That is all.

/If it were a topless crash SURVIVOR we wouldn't be having this discussion
//Which makes it God's fault
///Right?

Sandwyrm
And you people are FAR too quick to hate.

That's the origin of the word 'Fark'. It's a shortening of the phrase 'far too quick'.

1point21Jigowatts: did the paramedics cut her top off to treat her wounds, or was she driving around topless and had a wreck?? I think it's great that some women want to drive around topless, but if you do, to hell with your right to privacy. no one's violating anything by snapping pics.

So you're the guy that masturbated on to the flames of the burning car

I don't see a problem with a fire chief mailing pictures from a crash scene to surrounding departments, if they were for informational/training purposes. Even if they had nudity so what? A crash scene is not going to be pretty, there's likely to be severe death and dismemberment, in that scenario I don't see how a boob is a big deal. It'd be like telling a group of doctors there can't be any nudity in pictures they send to each other for work related purposes.

Now if the pictures were sent for fun, and purposely to highlight the nudity, then that's a problem. But at first glance, how likely does it seem that a fire chief of all people would send out pictures of a fatally wounded woman for fun? It's possible for sure, we'll just have to see.

Maybe she was a schoolteacher, and he was just saving her the trouble of sending the pictures to her students.

tkfourtwo1: /it really is the picture for every thread

Kudos -for some strange reason

This is funny, because just today I caught part of some cop show that showed videos of two "drunk" women who were pulled over and proceeded to strip naked and drench themselves in water (lounged under sprinklers). Sure it was censored on TV, but the cop admitted to having a personal copy of the incident and you just know it got passed around.

I heard of a case a little like this myself, though the firefighter in question didn't lose his job over it. When I worked ISP tech support, around 1996 we got a call from a guy who asked about our policy on content posted by members online. We (by which I mean I, since I was the user support department) told him our policy was anything legal goes and we don't go looking for illegal stuff.

He was a fire chief who was a member of several firefighter boards, where he and others frequently posted pics of the aftermath of fires for discussion. His account was on CompuServe and one day out of a clear blue sky, they yanked his account for posting objectionable content online. Turns out one of the last batch of pics he posted had a burned body in the corner, amongst a bunch of wreckage, somebody opened an official complaint with CompuServe, and he got booted from their service as a result.

Pics or it didn't happen.

Umatilla city Manager Glenn Irby said the woman, who later died, had her privacy rights violated.

I wasn't aware the right to privacy extended to public areas, such as walking down the street, in the mall, or on a public road?

STFU. If you don't want to be photographed in unflattering poses don't go shirtless when wrapping your vehicle around a tree.

We don't even have the right to privacy in our own homes. You sure as hell don't have one here.

packernilffimr­e­dnudco­m?

/Totally NOT obscure

Duel front airbags

tkfourtwo1: /it really is the picture for every thread

I missed out on this one.. Who is it?

if her airbags deployed, why is she dead??

Well he was Shirk, shirk is something bad in islam - hahahahaha