If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.
Fark SearchWeb Fark

         more options... Create account

(Independent) Interesting New study names London as capital of the world. New Yorkers roll out their view of the world maps and go "London?"   (news.independent.co.uk) divider line 200
More: Interesting  
•       •       •

6988 clicks; posted to Main » on 22 Dec 2007 at 1:45 PM   |  Make this a Fark FavoriteFavorite    |   share: Share on OMGTWITTER WEB2.0share on StumbleUponshare on Facebook  more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!

200 Comments   (+0 »)


Archived thread
First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all
 
Tenebreux 2007-12-22 01:47:28 PM  
London for the Win.

/SW17 represent.

 
lumiere [TotalFark] 2007-12-22 01:48:09 PM  
London? Might as well have put down Mumbai.

/ducks

 
TheKnownUniverse [TotalFark] 2007-12-22 01:48:38 PM  
Nodnol?

i132.photobucket.com

 
One F Jef 2007-12-22 01:49:33 PM  
Ya, maybe the Chav capital of the world.

 
eldopa 2007-12-22 01:50:14 PM  
I've also heard that Britannia rules the waves as well. Now this?

 
Garfield226 2007-12-22 01:50:14 PM  
This story brought to you by the 1800s.

 
Killemall 2007-12-22 01:50:57 PM  
...or the Orwellian surveillance capital of the world.

 
Gunny Highway 2007-12-22 01:51:07 PM  
My vote is for Providence.

 
El Robbo [recently expired TotalFark] 2007-12-22 01:52:33 PM  
"Capital" implies some kind of primacy or at least influence on the world stage. But it's not even an American city!

 
Englebert Slaptyback 2007-12-22 01:53:03 PM  
London?

London.

London?

London - bad food, worse weather, Mary ^%*@ing Poppins, LONDON!

 
GungFu 2007-12-22 01:54:43 PM  
www.wnd.com
Americans have maps?


i2.photobucket.com

 
Englebert Slaptyback 2007-12-22 01:55:38 PM  

TheKnownUniverse


Nodnol?


"The palindrome of 'London' would be 'Nodnol' - it don't work!"



(Apologies to Mr. Cleese)

 
C0rf 2007-12-22 01:55:52 PM  
Spent a lovely week in London last July.

Then I came back to my home two blocks north of the "capital of the free world."

truth be told, London is vastly more fun to spend time in, but the overreaching influence has been gone for some decades.

/can see the Washington Monument from my bedroom window
//would rather see Trafalgar Square

 
Rye_ [TotalFark] 2007-12-22 01:56:36 PM  
A friend and I went to London several years ago on the cheap. We stayed in a small room off of Earl's Court Road, ate as little as we could get away with and drank as much as possible. During the day, we'd go out and do a bunch of touristy things, then come back to the Imperial Pub in the evening to get schnockered with the locals.

The regulars there were genuinely curious about us and our trip - were we having a good time? What had we done that day? Did we need any help finding anything? All of them, just tremendously good-natured folks and very welcoming. On our last night there, every single person in that pub bought us each a pint. When I couldn't drink anymore, my friend walked with me back to the room and then returned to the pub. The whole place cheered him for coming back and took him out on the town when the place closed.

Best trip ever. London rocks.

 
sexlexia 2007-12-22 01:57:23 PM  
uhhh... well obviously.

Just looking at the criteria they used, it would be obvious(without even beginning to make calculations) that London is the obvious choice.
It looks like they started with London as the answer and worked the criteria second.
http://travel.independent.co.uk/news_and_advice/article3261398.ece

But really, is anyone surprised?

 
bongmiester [TotalFark] 2007-12-22 01:59:22 PM  
good - let's give them UN headquarters and all the fun there in

 
robbjohn [TotalFark] 2007-12-22 01:59:30 PM  
Here is the TOP 10:

1 London
2 New York
3 Paris
4 Tokyo
5 Chicago
6 Madrid
7 Washington DC
8 Los Angeles
9 Rome
10 Mexico City

 
disgustip8ed 2007-12-22 02:00:19 PM  
englebert Slaptyback

London?

London.

London?

London - bad food, worse weather, Mary ^%*@ing Poppins, LONDON!


Shut up you big bald f*#@!

 
You_mean_Im_gonna_stay_this_color [TotalFark] 2007-12-22 02:00:53 PM  
a120.ac-images.myspacecdn.com

 
serialkittenkiller 2007-12-22 02:01:02 PM  
What'd they get dentists or something?

 
cdharding 2007-12-22 02:01:38 PM  
FTA: dynamic Celtic conurbations. Yet it is London that rises above all other cities.

So, what the article is saying is that London is the world's biggest farm3.static.flickr.com

 
fappomatic 2007-12-22 02:02:16 PM  
Mai chippiez, nawt yoooors....

img337.imageshack.us

 
GuyCaballero 2007-12-22 02:02:20 PM  
wankery

 
WriteInCandidate 2007-12-22 02:02:35 PM  
Saul Steinberg unavailable for comment.

 
sleep lack 2007-12-22 02:03:15 PM  
Yes, London. You know: fish, chips, cup ‘o tea, bad food, worse weather, Mary farking Poppins… LONDON

 
sleep lack 2007-12-22 02:04:14 PM  
disgustip8ed
damnit.

 
megram 2007-12-22 02:04:45 PM  
Rye_

Sounds great.... Where was this London ?

Mind you, if you want to get to know the locals in the UK, go to the same pub for 3 nights on the trott. You will have hundreds of friends.

 
at80eighty [TotalFark] 2007-12-22 02:05:33 PM  
im sure i'd enjoy london a lot , but NYC is simply the. best. damn. city. ever. stupid prices notwithstanding

 
Steve_Rogers 2007-12-22 02:06:09 PM  
http://travel.independent.co.uk/news_and_advice/article3261398.ece

There's a shocker! :|

//mmm shocker...

 
JosephFinn 2007-12-22 02:06:21 PM  
Hell, I was pleased to see Chicago at #5, though I'd have slid it above Paris.

 
RickTheVote 2007-12-22 02:07:08 PM  
NYC is bust.

 
Oldiron_79 2007-12-22 02:07:38 PM  
As someone who has been to London, I'm really getting a kick out of some of these replies.

Lets see: bad teeth, bad food, warm beer. Yeah, that sounds like a real winnar. about the only thing they do have going for them is their women are known for loving to shave downstairs.

 
funkonomics 2007-12-22 02:08:28 PM  
London boogers FTW!!!!!

 
joman 2007-12-22 02:11:28 PM  
A British study done by a British newspaper stating that London, is the world capital? No conflict of interest there. None at all.

 
One F Jef 2007-12-22 02:11:49 PM  
Oh yeah, besides, Londoners smoke fags.

What other reason do you need to stay away?

 
TehLydzz 2007-12-22 02:12:00 PM  
TheKnownUniverse: Nodnol?

How bizarre. I was just watching that episode.

/.errazib woH

 
Gunny Highway 2007-12-22 02:15:49 PM  
I liked the food in London. Just me though.

 
SwallowTheKnife 2007-12-22 02:17:08 PM  
Oldiron_79:
Lets see: bad teeth, bad food, warm beer. Yeah, that sounds like a real winnar. about the only thing they do have going for them is their women are known for loving to shave downstairs.


So...the winnars should be fat, stupid, hairy drunks?

 
tripperday 2007-12-22 02:18:02 PM  
I haven't been to any of those cities.

/God I suck

 
Captain Ford Prefect 2007-12-22 02:18:25 PM  
I live in London, so I'm really getting kicked in the face.

/TW3 represent

 
YorkshireFark 2007-12-22 02:19:52 PM  
I could have bet my mortgage that this thread would be full of American haters.

I'm from England and I've never even been to London but the results of this study are no surprise to me!

 
AaaPha 2007-12-22 02:20:48 PM  
Meh, I prefer Bristol. MUCH smaller, friendlier, more fun. London's OK though. Different scale.

 
AaaPha 2007-12-22 02:22:18 PM  
Captain Ford Prefect: I'm really getting kicked in the face.

Yup, sounds like London. Less likely to get f*ing knifed in Bristol...

 
GOB 2007-12-22 02:22:31 PM  
New Yorkers roll out their view of the world mapsi237.photobucket.com

 
Ninja Wicked 2007-12-22 02:22:58 PM  
robbjohn: Here is the TOP 10:

1 London
2 New York
3 Paris
4 Tokyo
5 Chicago
6 Madrid
7 Washington DC
8 Los Angeles
9 Rome
10 Mexico City


Wheres Moose Jaw on that list?

 
invictuz 2007-12-22 02:25:19 PM  
haha...a london paper finds london to be the capital of the world!

Thats some fine police work there, lou!

 
MacGabhain 2007-12-22 02:25:46 PM  
I love the use of a local newsstand's stock of travel guides. Yup. That's objective. (If only there were an internationally accessible bookseller that kept information about the relative popularity of books available on its web site.) Shockingly, there are more guidebooks about London available in a London bookstore than about any other major city. That, combined with how often the city appeared in THEIR OWN travel section column, accounts for the difference between London and NYC.
Looking at the last few "objective" measures, they were clearly stretching for a way to have London come out ahead of New York. Each of the last three, by their own admission, is skewed in favor of London. (They have 4 Unesco World Heritage Sites -- to Rome's 2. Uh-huh. There's a valid measure of the amount of historical significance to the city.)

 
Smarshmallow 2007-12-22 02:26:29 PM  
robbjohn: Here is the TOP 10:

1 London
2 New York
3 Paris
4 Tokyo
5 Chicago
6 Madrid
7 Washington DC
8 Los Angeles
9 Rome
10 Mexico City


Right, because no cities in Asia have any significance. Typical euro-centric viewpoint.

 
WildMonkey 2007-12-22 02:26:30 PM  
Well, we can't have a capital of the world since we think there is no point in acknowledging other countries views.

 
saintstryfe 2007-12-22 02:27:23 PM  
Mexico City? Common. Toronto ranks on MExico City. easily.

 
Displayed 50 of 200 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | » | Last | Show all


[Continue Farking]