If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.
Fark SearchWeb Fark

         more options... Create account

(Boston Globe) Obvious Forty-five nations form a new environmental body to slow inevitable global warming and protect the planet. If you guessed the US was not one of the nations, you get a shiny new dime   (boston.com) divider line 577
More: Obvious  

577 Comments   (+0 »)


Archived thread
First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | » | Last | Show all
 
antialias [TotalFark] 2007-02-04 05:17:12 AM  
And if you guessed 90% of Europe and America and 100% of Canada doesn't give a farking damn about global warming right now because we're freezing our asses off, you get a shiny farking quarter.

 
Churchill2004 [TotalFark] 2007-02-04 05:55:34 AM  
China and India didn't either, which is worth noting. Not much point in doing anything if you can't them on board, too.

 
rackrent [TotalFark] 2007-02-04 05:58:58 AM  
Churchill2004: China and India didn't either, which is worth noting. Not much point in doing anything if you can't them on board, too.

You could always set an example for others, rather than making excuses.

 
soledsoled 2007-02-04 05:59:16 AM  
Why a dime?

 
stratagos 2007-02-04 06:00:18 AM  
Where's my dime, beotch?

 
Churchill2004 [TotalFark] 2007-02-04 06:01:35 AM  
rackrent: You could always set an example for others, rather than making excuses.


Meh. That's nice, except this isn't fourth grade, and other nations couldn't care less about how good an example you're setting.

 
MalvolioMandarin 2007-02-04 06:03:09 AM  
Upon hearing this news, The U.S. Mint declares all Pennies still cost more to produce than what they are worth. The 'Shiny-ness' costs extra, of course. Will provide more jobs in the long-run,however. All applicants must be able to 'doggie-paddle'.

 
deevo 2007-02-04 06:03:18 AM  
I'm an environmental studies major, I vote Green Party when it won't swing the election, I'm a vegetarian, etc.

That said, I farking hate China. India, too, but especially China, and if they're going to destroy the Earth, I want the U.S. to be kicking their ass the whole way down.

 
Michikade 2007-02-04 06:03:29 AM  
I accept all major credit cards through Paypal.

/where's my dime?

 
AstroMech 2007-02-04 06:08:47 AM  
I'll see your shiny dime and raise you a French news caster.
img82.imageshack.us

 
bakarocket 2007-02-04 06:10:45 AM  
I'm an environmental studies major, I vote Green Party when it won't swing the election, I'm a vegetarian, etc.

How does the above preclude the below?

That said, I farking hate China. India, too, but especially China, and if they're going to destroy the Earth, I want the U.S. to be kicking their ass the whole way down.

Why the hate? Jealous?

 
rackrent [TotalFark] 2007-02-04 06:11:36 AM  
Churchill2004: That's nice, except this isn't fourth grade, and other nations couldn't care less about how good an example you're setting.

Good point...how about the "World's Most Powerful Country" taking the lead on a really important issue and biatch slapping other countries for not toeing the line?

That works, too.

 
Esn 2007-02-04 06:14:39 AM  
Does anyone know where to find the full list of those 45 countries?

I'll bet Canada is going to join eventually if it hasn't already - public opinion seems to be swinging to environmental causes because of Mr. Dion, and all of the major parties (even the Conservatives) are trying to outdo each other. How long it'll last is anybody's guess.

 
Churchill2004 [TotalFark] 2007-02-04 06:15:52 AM  
rackrent: Good point...how about the "World's Most Powerful Country" taking the lead on a really important issue and biatch slapping other countries for not toeing the line?


How exaclty do you propose we biatch-slap China and India?

The only way to do it would be economic sanctions, which, ironically, Europe would never get behind.

 
Moray 2007-02-04 06:16:22 AM  
Bring back the Ice Age? I'd rather be sleding to work than running the AC all day... yeah right. We have had 18 global warmings in the last 2 million years so what makes people think they can stop a cycle that repeats about every 100,000 years sometimes killing 30-75% of all life on earth each time? The earth can fix anything that gets thrown at it ( well our sun going supernova should end the debate on GW).

 
MalvolioMandarin 2007-02-04 06:17:10 AM  
AstroMech
Hehehee niice.

All others:
I would like to know what France's swamp-gas output is. I cannot deny that the U.S.'s is huge! (TFA stated 1/4 of total world output, i think) How does china/India rank?

Maybe one of you more knowledgeable Farkers would please post a 'trust-worthy' graphic early and soon, we could avoid a whoooole bunch of random ridiculous back and forth.

My thanks in advance:
/beerslashies

 
log_jammin [TotalFark] 2007-02-04 06:19:36 AM  
rackrent: how about the "World's Most Powerful Country" taking the lead on a really important issue and biatch slapping other countries for not toeing the line?

So you want us to be the world police?

How are we gonna "biatch slap" them when they don't toe the line?

 
Jin Verde 2007-02-04 06:19:49 AM  
Up next, the daily debate on whether or not global warming is even occuring. Please post the "Not this shiat again" guy.
Kthx.

 
Lamune_Baba 2007-02-04 06:21:39 AM  
MalvolioMandarin

Maybe one of you more knowledgeable Farkers would please post a 'trust-worthy' graphic early and soon, we could avoid a whoooole bunch of random ridiculous back and forth.



www.venganza.org


/you're welcome

 
MalvolioMandarin 2007-02-04 06:24:35 AM  
Buahhawhahhawhhaa Yeaeeeargh! THat is some DAMN fine info there me bucko! :P

 
Esn 2007-02-04 06:25:15 AM  
There's no question that global warming is occuring anymore. NOW the debate seems to be about whether it's possible for humans to stop it.

But everyone agrees that if it's not stopped, the results for the world will be disastrous.

Personally, I'd argue that even slowing it down would be a nice goal. To give species time to adjust, and all that...

 
Turtle Head 2007-02-04 06:25:20 AM  
img211.imageshack.us

 
PigPen603 2007-02-04 06:26:40 AM  
rackrent: Good point...how about the "World's Most Powerful Country" taking the lead on a really important issue and biatch slapping other countries for not toeing the line?

We can't even biatch slap other countries for human rights violations or general ass-clownery without facing the judging finger points of the rest of the world. How could we justify to the UN that we need to invade a country becaus they won't implement a solid environmental improvement package?
We have found that sanctions don't work eg; Cuba and Iraq. The rich stay rich and the poor simply starve to death. Only the threat of invasion and deposition gets the attention of dictators and other wonderful fascist leaders.

 
MrBigglesworth 2007-02-04 06:28:39 AM  
"You could always set an example for others, rather than making excuses."

And so could nations like India and China.

Or is only the US allowed to be bashed in this thread as the title would suggest?

 
loudboy 2007-02-04 06:28:53 AM  
why does America hate the planet?

 
doctechnical 2007-02-04 06:29:52 AM  
rackrent: You could always set an example for others, rather than making excuses.

That's great advice for the first lemming in line.

 
IBelieveItsYogurt 2007-02-04 06:30:11 AM  
Churchill2004:

How about we stop the games of "Well they aren't doing it, so why should we?" and do a little bit to help the environment. I know that some "scientists" are saying that the current global warming trend is part of a cycle, and that there is nothing that we can do about the cycle. What if they are wrong? What is the cost of them being wrong? I would say the cost of them being wrong is a LOT higher than them being right.

 
Kzap 2007-02-04 06:30:55 AM  
I know that that proves nothing, but here in Italy this winter has been more like spring. We have had perhaps 10 days of cold weather, if at all, since november. Almost no snow until last week, and many trees have already bloomed.

Rain has also been scarce, and several glaciers haven't had the time to grow bigger, so once spring actually comes they might very well shrink much more than usual.

Of course, they may be periodic and perfectly natural shifts, but they sure make you wonder...

 
nonstopcrunchy [TotalFark] 2007-02-04 06:31:30 AM  
BUT BUT BUT LEFTISTS WAAAH

The liberal so-called laws of physics are clearly BIASED against decent God-fearing Americans.

 
Churchill2004 [TotalFark] 2007-02-04 06:33:32 AM  
IBelieveItsYogurt: How about we stop the games of "Well they aren't doing it, so why should we?"

Because if everyone doesn't do it, our economy gets hurt for nothing.

 
MrBigglesworth 2007-02-04 06:35:36 AM  
I have the solution to Global Warming. It is very simple too.

Outlaw and ban Volcanoes.

Any offending Volcanoes found to be spewing billions of tons of ash and dirt into the air in an amount far greater than the combined pollution output of the entirety of man will be fined.

Simple right?

 
doctechnical 2007-02-04 06:36:27 AM  
Esn: There's no question that global warming is occuring anymore. NOW the debate seems to be about whether it's possible for humans to stop it.

When the REAL debate should be "Why is Global Warming a Bad Thing again?"

But everyone agrees that if it's not stopped, the results for the world will be disastrous.

Because when you plot the advance of human civilization against global mean temperature you see that humans thrive when it's cold, and shrivel up and die when it gets warm.

Wait. Strike that. Reverse it. Thank you.
/wonka

 
nonstopcrunchy [TotalFark] 2007-02-04 06:36:43 AM  
Because if everyone doesn't do it, our economy gets hurt for nothing.

Poor diddums. You could easily defray the cost of Fixing This shiat by, I dunno, not spending several billion bucks a week in corporate graft to Haliburton etc.

Wait ... I think I heard a leftist in the wainscotting! GOD HELP US

 
Hilary T. N. Seuss 2007-02-04 06:38:06 AM  
Dear Boston Globe, that was a horribly uninformative article, unlike this one.

See? That one actually mentions that what you describe as a "climate group" and an "environmental body" would actually be a United Nations agency. Yeah! Another layer of unaccountable bureaucracy! That always works! Next time, why not at least mention the UN somewhere in TFA?

Plus, it also adds Russia and Brazil to the countries not supporting this, so what's the friggin' point?

 
pjc51 2007-02-04 06:39:19 AM  
And if you guessed 90% of Europe and America and 100% of Canada doesn't give a farking damn about global warming right now because we're freezing our asses off, you get a shiny farking quarter.

http://www.frankejames.com/debate/?p=19

 
doctechnical 2007-02-04 06:41:19 AM  
MrBigglesworth: I have the solution to Global Warming. It is very simple too.

Outlaw and ban Volcanoes.


Here's another easy solution, a bit easier to implement: paint your roof white. That way it will reflect heat rather than absorb it, thus reducing global warming to an extent:

http://www.treehugger.com/files/2005/12/white_roofs_to.php

C'mon, Greenies! Go White Power! W00t!

 
nonstopcrunchy [TotalFark] 2007-02-04 06:41:36 AM  
I think some people would, if the UN declared the sky to be blue, glue green contact lenses onto their actual eyeballs out of spite, and then log on to LGF or FreeRepublic to call for the execution of blue-thinking treasonous commie traitors.

At least, that's the impression an antipodean gets from Fark.

 
joshzsmith [TotalFark] 2007-02-04 06:42:07 AM  
More left wing propaganda. Everyone knows thar are more than 17 pirates around nowadays.

 
Death By Monkey 2007-02-04 06:42:14 AM  
Churchill2004: Because if everyone doesn't do it, our economy gets hurt for nothing.


And how, exactly, would improving the environment hurt our economy? We make more fuel efficient cars and people stop buying them? If you paid attention, you would have seen Toyota and Honda are kicking our butts right now.

 
RagnarD 2007-02-04 06:42:44 AM  
MrBigglesworth [TotalFark]
Outlaw and ban Volcanoes.

Any offending Volcanoes found to be spewing billions of tons of ash and dirt into the air in an amount far greater than the combined pollution output of the entirety of man will be fined.


Let's be sure cosmic rays are on the ban-list too. Those suckers can wreak havoc on an atmosphere.

 
nonstopcrunchy [TotalFark] 2007-02-04 06:43:18 AM  
Death By Monkey: SILENCE. OBEY. CONSUME.

 
auschunky 2007-02-04 06:47:39 AM  
doctechnical When the REAL debate should be "Why is Global Warming a Bad Thing again?"

Well Australia's current 5 year drought for a start. Here is something to think about: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/6065220.stm

 
Telos 2007-02-04 06:48:42 AM  
2007-02-04 06:21:39 AMLamune_Baba

Never heard of music piracy then? I think you're graphi is drastically underestimating the number of pirates in the world!

 
Jesda 2007-02-04 06:49:08 AM  
how about the "World's Most Powerful Country" taking the lead on a really important issue and biatch slapping other countries for not toeing the line?

If we bomb them into the stone age, their industrial production will plummet, people will die, and global warming will be SOLVED!

 
Descartes 2007-02-04 06:49:41 AM  
We could use another Medieval Warm Period.

Less snow, growing more crops, healthier people, awwwww, that's the life!

 
log_jammin [TotalFark] 2007-02-04 06:50:01 AM  
Death By Monkey: And how, exactly, would improving the environment hurt our economy?

We increase the cost of goods to the point where no one buys them so companies start producing them over seas in places like...oh...I don't know.....someplace that doesn't have such strict environment policies.....like....China maybe?

 
rackrent [TotalFark] 2007-02-04 06:56:13 AM  
log_jammin: o you want us to be the world police?

Ya'll see, that's what we here call sarcasm. The U.S. has been doing a good pretending to be the "world police" in that whole Middle East thing.

To me, it's hypocritical of them to say we want to be the only superpower, but use the excuse of "well, other countries don't like it either!"

There's you're lemmings to the cliff analogy.

 
Death By Monkey 2007-02-04 06:59:16 AM  
log_jammin: We increase the cost of goods to the point where no one buys them so companies start producing them over seas in places like...oh...I don't know.....someplace that doesn't have such strict environment policies.....like....China maybe?

I'm not sure I get your logic. Are you saying that we don't already buy our electronic devices from Japan?

 
doctechnical 2007-02-04 07:00:14 AM  
auschunky: Well Australia's current 5 year drought for a start. Here is something to think about:

Thus quoth the page:

With the drought now in its sixth year, Australia's big dry is the worst in over a century.

Implying there was a nastier drought over a century ago. Which would coincide with the introduction of the Ford Explorer, right?

 
rackrent [TotalFark] 2007-02-04 07:00:52 AM  
Jesda: If we bomb them into the stone age, their industrial production will plummet, people will die, and global warming will be SOLVED!


It seems a lot of people in this thread actually believe that.

/shakes head

 
Displayed 50 of 577 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | » | Last | Show all


[Continue Farking]