If you can read this, either the style sheet didn't load or you have an older browser that doesn't support style sheets. Try clearing your browser cache and refreshing the page.
Fark SearchWeb Fark

         more options... Create account

(Some Guy) Stupid San Diego neighborhood celebrates new $593,000 public restroom   (10news.com) divider line 68
More: Stupid  
•       •       •

11512 clicks; posted to Main » on 01 Jul 2005 at 6:30 AM   |  Make this a Fark FavoriteFavorite    |   share: Share on OMGTWITTER WEB2.0share on StumbleUponshare on Facebook  more»   |    Get this fabulous T-Shirt and impress the methane out of your friends! shirt it!

68 Comments   (+0 »)


Archived thread
First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all
 
r_k_ologist 2005-06-30 11:31:00 PM  
I'm gonna go take a $100,000 shiat there.

 
Surf Nazi 2005-06-30 11:36:18 PM  
I'll go do it tomorrow, and maybe take pics for all you TFers. Of the bathroom of course, not of my deposit.

 
CougarJeff [TotalFark] 2005-06-30 11:47:10 PM  
Somebody will still clog it up.

 
XXIV_Corps 2005-07-01 12:20:23 AM  
"It was funded by the transient occupancy tax"

Beach bums on benches taxed?

 
BearToy [TotalFark] 2005-07-01 01:09:30 AM  



 
mathmatix 2005-07-01 03:07:20 AM  
after the ribbon was cut, this man disappeared:

 
Bonzo_1116 2005-07-01 04:04:45 AM  
$593,000??!?!?!!?!?!

For a bathroom with less than 10 stalls?!?!!?!?!?!

Holy shiat!

I'm going to have to pee in there this weekend. I thought that our city finances were going down the crapper, but this is ridiculous.

 
RabidSquirrel 2005-07-01 06:42:11 AM  
Bonzo_1116:

I thought that our city finances were going down the crapper, but this is ridiculous.

It's not so much that they're going down the crapper as they're going INTO the crapper.

 
ghare 2005-07-01 06:44:50 AM  
Well, if you're going to have homeless people I guess it's either this or let them shiat all over your city. Still seems mighty expensive.

 
watchmesuck 2005-07-01 06:45:59 AM  
RabidSquirrel

For $593,000 it should be going into THE crapper.

 
RabidSquirrel 2005-07-01 06:52:44 AM  
watchmesuck: For $593,000 it should be going into THE crapper.

Or maybe it should be GOING into the crapper.

...nope, that doesn't work as well as the others.

 
Bonzo_1116 2005-07-01 06:55:07 AM  
Hey, going down or going into the crapper--what does it matter? The San Diego budget has been circling the bowl for years. It just won't go down no matter how many times they flush.

 
RabidSquirrel 2005-07-01 06:57:29 AM  
Bonzo_1116:

Hey, going down or going into the crapper--what does it matter? The San Diego budget has been circling the bowl for years. It just won't go down no matter how many times they flush.

You win.

 
sinaseens 2005-07-01 07:01:54 AM  
HAH. way to spend tax dollars idiots. especially with all the scandal with the mayor and budgets, etc. i love sd, but it needs to get its house in order..

 
Major Thomb 2005-07-01 07:07:35 AM  
It's probably $60,000 for the building and $533,000 for the property.

 
GreenSlime 2005-07-01 07:13:55 AM  
$593,000 breakdown:

$150,000 for the land
$93,000 for building construction, material, labor, etc
$100,000 for administrative fees
$100,000 for kickbacks
$100,000 for booze & hookers
$50,000 for misc/other

/back to school

 
Scoats 2005-07-01 07:14:45 AM  
I liked the link to video on the TV Stations Website: "La Jolla Dumps Nearly $600K In New Bathroom"

 
Day_Old_Dutchie 2005-07-01 07:16:18 AM  
Well, in our town, the local paper screams how the roads here are "a haven for speeders" (big fat lie, drivers here are pussies) and they need to hire more cops with radar guns to reduce the carnage. The cops here LIE about what they see on their radar guns to make the quotas and the chief budgets 30% of their time just to show up at traffic court so it's useless trying to fight tickets.

At least a half-million-dollar crapper won't give you bullshiat speeding tickets, although I'd rather the city use the money to fund public transit so I won't have to drive everywhere.

 
xLizzieBordenx 2005-07-01 07:19:01 AM  
The saddest thing of all is, you pay about that much for less than a studio apartment nearby in La Jolla.

I'm a La Jolla resident, but only cuz I got lucky.

 
elendilmir 2005-07-01 07:24:33 AM  
500,000??!?? Are there pre paid hookers (actual women types) in it or something?

 
The Reichman 2005-07-01 07:32:18 AM  
are they going to put those $9000 meters outside?

 
EmbodiedHate 2005-07-01 07:37:42 AM  
8000000 visitors to the beach area this thing serves a year, if the thing works for 10 years without a major facelift, it's a justifiable price.

 
jdvthejd 2005-07-01 07:57:18 AM  
Its not like this is as big of waste as it might appear. It will all be worth it for the tourist revenue that this part of the city creates. And it's a bit deceiving to say its just a bathroom since it has a changing room and showers. It's a popular beach break for surfers and every stretch of beach in SD county has a comparable facility. It just so happens that La Jolla has the nicest facility (and is one of the most expensive areas in the US).

 
Major Thomb 2005-07-01 08:00:54 AM  
GreenSlime: $150,000 for the land


This is La Jolla we're talking about. You could put up a lamp post with $150K of property.

 
Ender's [TotalFark] 2005-07-01 08:09:07 AM  
Wow. What a deal.

 
Inmate_55170-054 2005-07-01 08:11:23 AM  
It was funded by the transient occupancy tax,

They are taxing the homeless? Shame on them.

 
TightyWhitey 2005-07-01 08:12:16 AM  
I'm going straight there to spread doo-doo all over the walls.

 
apotheosis247 2005-07-01 08:16:07 AM  
Putting cost aside for a moment, who holds a ribbon-cutting for a freakin' bathroom?! Furthermore, who considers a public toilet to be "infrastructure"

/ votes to add a "California" tag to the list

 
all_you_need_is_porsche 2005-07-01 08:38:28 AM  
For $593,000 the gold plated toilets better wipe my ass for me.

$593,000 will buy you an enormous house here in Sugar Land. ...stupid California land price and $150,000 lamp posts...

 
Chiba-lobalip 2005-07-01 08:38:29 AM  
This new facility should be popular with the "boys" after hours. Did they predrill glory holes?

 
snoringtoad 2005-07-01 08:43:29 AM  
Wow i miss San Diego so much. What a great city. Surfing was great.

/got driven out by housing costs..
//$500,000 for a 2 bedroom shack. 1100 sq feet. no yard.

 
ColonelFlagg 2005-07-01 08:44:05 AM  
I think that's what they should replace Justice Souter's house with when they claim "eminent domain" on it.

/clearly I have no idea how to use "eminent domain" as a verb

 
JonnyEuchre 2005-07-01 08:47:21 AM  
I like how the article stated it so matter-of-factly, as though all outdoor, cement sh@tters are supposed to cost a half million dollars.

 
Dinty Moore's Law 2005-07-01 08:54:44 AM  


Last seen travelling
south on Interstate 5
at a high rate of speed

 
TheIronJef 2005-07-01 09:15:51 AM  
If you guys aren't familiar with San Diego too much, lemme break it down for you. La Jolla is only technically a part of the city. They really really like to pretend that they're a separate city, they go as far as writing it on their stationery and having town council meetings and such. The reason it's so important to them is that they're the second richest local neighborhood, and the richest in the metro area. The spend 600,000 dollars on everything they ever do, it helps them to achieve a feeling of disconnect from the town they don't want to be in.

Everyone else in SD hates La Jollans. For further reasons, let's start with the cross on Mt. Soledad and the La Jolla town council vote to remove the sea lions from a beach zoned for La Jolla children, thus eliminating the only spot in the continental US where humans can get so close to sea lions.

/hopes the La Jollans blow out their insides with too much chicken skin.

 
Denise R Sharpe 2005-07-01 09:21:40 AM  
Scoats
I liked the link to video on the TV Stations Website: "La Jolla Dumps Nearly $600K In New Bathroom"

That is classic!

 
Shiftless 2005-07-01 09:27:18 AM  
The cost of living is insane in California

 
apotheosis247 2005-07-01 09:34:31 AM  
I think that's what they should replace Justice Souter's house with when they claim "eminent domain" on it.

Congress is already moving to restrict eminent domain, as a so-called 'check on an out-of-control judiciary' (the shiat runs deep), so he probably doesn't have to worry too much.

 
apotheosis247 2005-07-01 09:37:09 AM  
The cost of living is insane in California.

Blame Prop 13...

 
NutSack 2005-07-01 09:39:18 AM  
I could get almost 14 mecha's for that price, I'd hate to run into that gang in a dark alley.

 
Lee Harvey Osmond 2005-07-01 09:45:09 AM  
>?????

You can't blame a limitation of property taxes for the high cost of living in CA. The reason would be, uh, you know, SUPPLY AND DEMAND......

Oh yeah, that and you don't have to shovel snow out of your driveway unless you live in the mountains.

Sounds like someone just wants to see us Californians get screwed on property taxes like the rest of the country.

/loves prop 13

 
apotheosis247 2005-07-01 09:48:51 AM  
I never said it was the only reason, let me rephrase:

Blame Prop 13 and some other stuff

 
j__z 2005-07-01 09:50:54 AM  
EmbodiedHate

"if the thing works for 10 years without a major facelift, it's a justifiable price"

Not even that justifies the price. Its a masonry block building, maybe ~2000 SF, if that. It has no special finishes or features. So the cost is $296 a square foot is out of hand. At most is should have cost $300,000 even if the drainage, water, and parking were an issue.

/Somebody got paid.

 
Lee Harvey Osmond 2005-07-01 10:10:19 AM  
"Not even that justifies the price. Its a masonry block building, maybe ~2000 SF, if that. It has no special finishes or features. So the cost is $296 a square foot is out of hand. At most is should have cost $300,000 even if the drainage, water, and parking were an issue."

Don't forget the ridiculous "prevailing wage" laws that require, essentially, union scale be (over)paid to those who work on the project. You or I could get the same building built for much less cost.

Nothing like giving away taxpayer money, huh?

 
abstractpoetic 2005-07-01 10:17:22 AM  


(You can see seals at La Jolla.)
(Sorry.)

 
I'm_a_moran 2005-07-01 10:17:46 AM  
Don't forget the ridiculous "prevailing wage"

What this means in Cali is that the GC on a public project picks up illegal laborers, pays then $27.50hr (billing out at a 175% mark-up), takes them to cash their checks, and pockets all but $7hr.

Gov't is just another word for fraud.

 
esperanto99 2005-07-01 10:35:13 AM  
ADA adds to the expense too. They could have built 24 stalls in the same amount of space, but thanks to ADA it has to be big enough to acommodate a sea lion that wants to come in off the beach and take a leak.

 
esperanto99 2005-07-01 10:40:38 AM  
It's great that slideshows enable more pictures to illustrate the story, but how farking necessary is this?


 
Guy Named Ed 2005-07-01 10:55:49 AM  
A restroom for $593,000? Amateurs! Here in Winnipeg it was decided to build a restaurant in the middle of a bridge. The cost to put a washroom there (including plumbing, electricity, heating, etc.) was over $1,000,000 which even in Canadian funds tops this amount. I don't know if the number of stalls has ever been reported but I suspect it's probably 4 stalls maximum.

I believe the restaurant was to finally open today, having been vacant for over a year as the city tried to find someone crazy (or rich) enough to open something there. Y'see, unfortunately the space has a few flaws some people didn't consider when planning was made. First, the bridge itself has 2 separate 2-lane spans for cars, and a separate span for pedestrians. The restaurant is on the pedestrian span which by design is barely wide enough for a car. Trying and get supplies to the place is difficult at best. Next, the plumbing lines needed to be heated because of course Winnipeg is a little chilly in the winter (-40F days not uncommon) and the last thing anyone needs is for the pipes to freeze solid and crack. And on the subject of weather, who wants to walk the several hundred feet to the middle of a bridge in anything but the most comfortable of weather? As most Winnipeggers will tell you, the number of comfortable days in Winnipeg typically run in the low double digits!

/not from the Tourist Winnipeg department...

 
tuaca.rockah 2005-07-01 11:11:37 AM  
The expense of property in La Jolla is three time more than metro San Diego. Doesnt surprise me at all that this crapper was that expensive.

Long live the seals at Childrens Beach.

 
Displayed 50 of 68 comments

First | « | 1 | 2 | » | Last | Show all


[Continue Farking]